Notepad3 (64-bit) v5.19.723.2403 BETA
Scintilla v420 (RegEx: Oniguruma v6.9.3)
Compiler: MS Visual C++ 2019 v16.1.(0-6) (VC v1921)
(en-GB) English (brit.) translation by hpwamr
Hello @RaiKoHoff
It would be nice to have all the "versions" of the "add-on" gathered in the About text version:
For example (not exhaustive list):
Notepad3 (64-bit) v5.19.723.2403 BETA
Scintilla v420 (RegEx: Oniguruma v6.9.3)
Compiler: MS Visual C++ 2019 v16.1.(0-6) (VC v1921)
Encoding: UCHARDET version 0.0.5 ???
Encryption: NotepadCrypt (Version Java ???)
Notepad3.ini: SettingsVersion=4
Minipath (64-bit) 1 Build 161
TinyExpr version ???
uthash version ???
OS version (??-bit)
OS local language
ANSI CP
????
(en-GB) English (brit.) translation by hpwamr
The header of the about box is already stuffed with overwhelming information - we should not extend this. Compromise: on pressing the Copy Version Text button, the clipboard may be extended by the information you suggest ... :thinking:
Hi, my suggestion was well for the "Copy Version Text" : 馃槈
Hello @RaiKoHoff ,
Suggestion in "About" info:
The current standard has become rather x64 Windows (64-bit) and x86 Windows (32-bit) has rather become an exception. 馃
Maybe it's time to change the "About" information to:
You are right, but it is still unusual, to mark apps with "(32-bit)".
Maybe, we can use both to be still explicit 馃
I like your suggestion @RaiKoHoff.
Feel free to test development beta version v5.19.730.2521 RC2.
Formidable 馃槂
Notepad3 (32-bit) v5.19.731.2522 RC2
Compiler: MS Visual C++ 2019 v16.2.0 (VC v1922)
OS Version: Windows 10 Version 1903 (Build 18362)
Locale: en-GB (Codepage: 'ANSI (CP-1252)')
Scintilla v420
Oniguruma v6.9.3
UChardet v2018.09.27
TinyExpr v2018.05.11
UTHash v2.1.0
Notepad3 (64-bit) v5.19.731.2522 RC2
Compiler: MS Visual C++ 2019 v16.2.0 (VC v1922)
OS Version: Windows 10 Version 1903 (Build 18362)
Locale: en-GB (Codepage: 'ANSI (CP-1252)')
Scintilla v420
Oniguruma v6.9.3
UChardet v2018.09.27
TinyExpr v2018.05.11
UTHash v2.1.0
Most helpful comment
You are right, but it is still unusual, to mark apps with "(32-bit)".
Maybe, we can use both to be still explicit 馃