Ctrl+F to open the _Find Text_ dialog box. The _Search String_ input box now has focus.Esc to close the _Find Text_ dialog box.The caret should stop at this occurrence.
In reality the caret merely stays at its very first position (i.e. it has not been moved at all), so as soon as the _Find Text_ dialog box is closed, the view port jumps back to where the caret sits before the dialog is opened.
The highlighting-on-the-fly feature is nice, but ... here it confuses me. :confused:
Hello @lhmouse ,
this works as designed (maybe the design can be discussed):
Only the view is moved (scrolled to) not the caret, cause:
ESC and he will find himself where he started from (caret position).F3 (multiple F3 to go to next matches).Discussion opened...
I know it is by design. Originally pressing Enter inside the find dialog will move the caret to the first occurrence, which is virtually unaltered. I haven't seen an editor have this feature, but my browser (Opera) does highlight matches upon input, and does not revert the view port on Esc. I am quite used to both behaviors above, but not the one currently Notepad3 has. A switch between these could be nice.
Ok, I see your point. Just waiting for more opinions ...
For a change of the behavior, some points have to be clarified:
ESC: close search dialog (vies stays on current selection/caret positionENTER: move selection/caret to next matching position, keep input focus on search dialog(Shift+)F3: move selection/caret to next/prev matching position, and set/keep input focus on editorWhat is the behavior of other text editors? 馃
From Visual Studio : Incremental Search (Ctrl+I): it is like the new described behavior.
If 1) typing in the search field updates the selection then 2) behavior on Esc requires no special treatment since the caret has already been moved to where it should be, and 3) behavior on Enter will skip the current match as it has already been made.
Please test development beta version "_develop_3.18.507.1022".
Nice work!
Please, tell us what is changed in "_develop_3.18.507.1022"? 馃槒
Compared to current RC:
Hmmm this version has another issue:
I have the 2nd default scheme turned on, which has the font size set to 10, while the 1st default scheme has the font size set to 18. However, when I create a new file, the margins between lines look as if I were using the 1st default scheme:

Manually turning off then back on the 2nd scheme makes it looks good again:

@lhmouse : Confirmed.
Please test development beta "_develop_4.18.508.1026".
I can confirm it has been fixed now.
This is fixed on master and I am closing this now.
Hmm... now switching syntax schemes turns off 2nd default scheme if it was on. Is this by design or a bug?
@lhmouse : It's a bug - nice finding.
Please try development beta "_develop_4.18.509.1028".
Yes this issue has been fixed, but there is again a new one. Further discussion is continued in #488.