As Chris I want to know, that I have to withdraw the tokens from the UDC on the UDC screen so that I am not getting confused.

@christianbrb Not very obvious how to best solve this atm. Was thinking about the problem today and also discussing a bit with @weilbith . We decided to push this to when @sashseurat is back from vacations to discuss possible solutions with her.
@sashseurat Design?
@christianbrb @taleldayekh @weilbith
Click-dummy showcasing the solutions for UX/UI issues is here ready for review:
https://www.figma.com/proto/5H8EOoC2SntoXZuTtUZsyY/LC-UDC-Screen-Optimisation?node-id=42%3A0&viewport=-96%2C461%2C0.25&scaling=min-zoom
A fast and primitive feedback from my side: great work @sashseurat I'm impressed. Not that I've expected anything else. :grimacing:
@sashseurat Thanks a lot for the new design and the detailed description :) It is a big improvement.
My remarks:
@sashseurat Thanks a lot for the new design and the detailed description :) It is a big improvement.
My remarks:
- Planned Withdrawals -> Withdrawals in progress / No withdrawals in progress
I didnt get this
- No text smaller than 12px (I haven't checked)
There is a varty of reasons to have some text smaller than 12px - for example: when text is in all caps, the letter skeleton is higher and text is visually processed as bigger - 10px = 12px etc. This is common.
- User Deposit Contract Balance -> no capital letters
Why?
- Buttons -> White text on turquoise as we do it on the other buttons as well
I made a conscious decision to not have the same styling to the buttons as in the transfer screen. This screen is similar to a settings screen, and its functions should not seem to User as primary in the dApp. This is common.
Also, I will be very happy to test this with hired testers. We can use this click-dummy in this platform I use Maze. It allows us to prepare a test including the click dummy, questions, and more and get a detailed usability report with actual metrics we can refer to - instead of a personal opinion. As the click-dummy is ready - this won't take more than an hour to do, and in two hours approximately we can have all the data gathered from 25 testers (that have varied levels of technical proficiency, gender, age, etc.)
We can ALSO do A/B testing...
Planned Withdrawals -> Withdrawals in progress / No withdrawals in progress
I didnt get this
I kina agree with Christian here. I hope it is fine to put feedback here as a developer.
So while on the contract implementation and from the protocol it is called a planned withdraw, I think is a bad naming for the user. I could imagine that it is way easier to understand that a withdrawal he triggered is in progress, rather than it is planned... But only because the whole UDC concept is not well known to the user in general. If he is used to this term, he understand it. But how it is now...
Ah sorry, I didn't get the comment but after reading it again I get it 馃槄 to change the label text.
I changed the click-dummy to have those labels, and here is a picture:

Withdrawals is a terrible word!