https://twitter.com/brianleroux/status/952567146185289729
Personally, I think "number of direct dependents" is more likely to be useful than "number of stars". I think it would be good to include at the top of the repo next to watch/star.
Thoughts?
Refined GitHub has zero dependents, does that make it useless? 馃構
That said, it may be useful, my only concern is that it might be a bit long and cause the repo name to wrap

This feature is supported by too few languages at the moment to be useful to me. Also, as @bfred-it said, non-libraries would never have dependents.
Github's dependency detection still seems very young. Even in languages where it is supported, I've seen times where it didn't show any dependents.
However, I expect it will get better.
It's already working in enough places to be useful to me more often than watch/fork counts.
Github's dependency detection still seems very young. Even in languages where it is supported, I've seen times where it didn't show any dependents.
This comment was a year ago and the situation has not improved. I don't think the dependents feature is good enough for us to prominently display it with stars.
For what repos is it inconsistent?
My experience is all with JS, and the dependency tracking has been 100% every time I've checked it for many months now.
Are there some non-JS languages where it still has issues?
https://twitter.com/github/status/1131468413983961088

I guess that at some point we can drop the "Used by" text from the button
Most helpful comment
This feature is supported by too few languages at the moment to be useful to me. Also, as @bfred-it said, non-libraries would never have dependents.