Need to decide whether we want to apply positive score to peers (mostly for successful swaps and fee payment), or continue with the current, negative-only approach. It's mostly to know whether we need to do some semantic changes in the code.
Also, whether we want to call this a reputation system, considering it's local only.
@kilrau the reputation isn't merely for blacklisting. It's also to prioritize between peers.
I like the idea of positive peer scores. As for whether it's a reputation system, I don't think that's exactly the best term since it would in fact be local. I think just calling it something like a "peer score" is fine, and it starts at zero and can move in either direction.
increasing reputation = add positive reputation & potentially remove old neg reputation
clearly define positive & negative events
@michael1011 please link to events in code
@kilrau We have one positive event right now which is a successful swap.
I can't think of any other positive events right now so I agree with @sangaman to close this issue.