One of the best things about TinyWall is the autolearn mode, which works like this:
This is the only thing that's stopping me and many others from switching to simplewall. If this feature is added, I'll be happy to recommend this project over TinyWall in my Windows privacy guide.
Yes, it's pretty much like that. It's really useful for apps like Steam, Riot, Thunderbird, ... that have multiple exe files and you don't want to add them one by one.
I strongly disagree and don't recommend autolearn mode!
This was already a problem with TinyWall. If you turn it on, your whole system is whitelisted and every program (not yet explicitely blocked) is able to connect out/in while you're maybe just seeking for one specific app/exe. You might end up whitelisting apps you don't want to and you opened the traffic for some maybe unwanted apps during autolearn mode. Of course you can verify the whitelisted apps during autolearn mode afterwards, but there is always a chance you miss something you don't want.
Instead of introducing autolearn mode ala TinyWall, I strongly recommend fixing and enhancing the reliability of the current notification system. If the notification system catches every app correctly, there is simply no need for an autolearn mode.
For example: when steam connects to the internet, it requires a few more executables to get whitelisted to work properly. Currently the notifcation system fails by either showing no notifications at all, or just for the steam.exe and not steamwebhelper.exe and others which are required for steam to work. Comodo firewall was rock solid when it comes to correct notifications (but sucks so much on other aspects), if Simplewall gets that rock solid too, there would be just no need for an autolearn mode.
not good idea.keep it simple
better be simplewall scanner(seperate exe), scan drives for exe
show you window to allow wanted program then create and export rules
then import rule in simplewall
@tokariu, @heforfree I completely agree, autolearn mode for lazys.
How about whitelisting by clicking on a window? That was also a really useful thing
On 23 May 2018 06:29:39 CEST, Henry++ notifications@github.com wrote:
@tokariu, @heforfree complete agree, autolearn mode for lazys.
--
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/henrypp/simplewall/issues/180#issuecomment-391216734
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
@adolfintel it's for lazys too, hard ("clicking on a window" means handler injection into explorer) integration into windows will not be implemented at all.
I don't see how it's for lazy. By selecting a window you can know which process that handle belongs to (easy to do in c++) and you can show a dialog for that exe.
I understand your point about autolearn, I always have to make sure it doesn't whitelist something completely unrelated, but this seems very reasonable to me. Adding executables one by one is hated by most people.
On 23 May 2018 07:24:12 CEST, Henry++ notifications@github.com wrote:
@adolfintel it's for lazys too, hard ("clicking on a window" means
handler injection into explorer) integration into windows will not be
implemented at all.--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/henrypp/simplewall/issues/180#issuecomment-391224217
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
@adolfintel, it's both useless, because simplewall already have notifications and simplification of this feature is not on my way.
Most helpful comment
I strongly disagree and don't recommend autolearn mode!
This was already a problem with TinyWall. If you turn it on, your whole system is whitelisted and every program (not yet explicitely blocked) is able to connect out/in while you're maybe just seeking for one specific app/exe. You might end up whitelisting apps you don't want to and you opened the traffic for some maybe unwanted apps during autolearn mode. Of course you can verify the whitelisted apps during autolearn mode afterwards, but there is always a chance you miss something you don't want.
Instead of introducing autolearn mode ala TinyWall, I strongly recommend fixing and enhancing the reliability of the current notification system. If the notification system catches every app correctly, there is simply no need for an autolearn mode.
For example: when steam connects to the internet, it requires a few more executables to get whitelisted to work properly. Currently the notifcation system fails by either showing no notifications at all, or just for the steam.exe and not steamwebhelper.exe and others which are required for steam to work. Comodo firewall was rock solid when it comes to correct notifications (but sucks so much on other aspects), if Simplewall gets that rock solid too, there would be just no need for an autolearn mode.