https://scout.scilifelab.se/cust003/14027/a2aefd060f80b751b3d227e587ffb00f
For several variant the CLinVar info in not appearing.
Se ex.
Thought the gnomAD link I can see that the variant is in ClinVar.
I've check some more cases and this seam to be a general issue
Yes it's on Clinvar, now you see it also on the clinVar track on IGV viewer. I'll check why the link doesn't show!
Where is that the clinVar info should show @4WGH ?
thanks! we miss it very much from the variant page
Cool to see it also in the IGV 🙂
Från: Chiara Rasi notifications@github.com
Skickat: den 6 mars 2020 10:15
Till: Clinical-Genomics/scout scout@noreply.github.com
Kopia: Michela Barbaro michela.barbaro@sll.se; Author author@noreply.github.com
Ämne: Re: [Clinical-Genomics/scout] CLin Var link missing (#1777)
Yes it's on Clinvar, now you see it also on the clinVar track on IGV viewer. I'll check why the link doesn't show!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Clinical-Genomics/scout/issues/1777?email_source=notifications&email_token=AC7R5EISZDQW74B4G32HVWDRGC5KNA5CNFSM4LC24YKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEOAUTAI#issuecomment-595675521, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7R5EL34XSLT7BXKZJGOBDRGC5KNANCNFSM4LC24YKA.

it used to be somewhere here.
Looks like a MIP/Scout communication issue to me? No CLNSIG, CLNVID, CLNACC or CLNREVSTAT in there, but some conspiciuos looking CSQ-fields by the names of CLINVAR|CLINVAR_CLNSIG|CLINVAR_CLNVID|CLINVAR_CLNREVSTAT? Are there news in the format for MIP8 @henrikstranneheim @jemten?
keentroll_gatkcomb_rhocall_vt_af_frqf_cadd_vep_parsed_ranked.selected.vcf.gz
7 103194254 rs149837553 A G 1221.10 PASS AC=2;AF=0.333;AN=6;Annotation=RELN;BaseQRankSum=-0.191;CADD=24.1;CSQ=G|missense_variant|MODERATE|RELN|ENSG00000189056|Transcript|ENST00000343529|protein_coding|39/64||ENST00000343529.5:c.5822T>C|ENSP00000345694.5:p.Val1941Ala|5982|5822|1941|V/A|gTt/gCt|||-1||HGNC|9957||||CCDS34722.1|ENSP00000345694|P78509|Q75MM8|UPI0000160333||Ensembl|A|A||deleterious|benign|hmmpanther:PTHR11841||||||0.175|6.07|6.07|0.32053|0.994000|8.947000|1.00|6.538|10.425|5.526|6.534|-3.539|0.336|-3.203|-3.203|-5.122|-1.830|-3.897|-6.952||||281632|Uncertain_significance|281632|criteria_provided&_multiple_submitters&_no_conflicts|,G|missense_variant|MODERATE|RELN|ENSG00000189056|Transcript|ENST00000424685|protein_coding|39/65||ENST00000424685.2:c.5822T>C|ENSP00000388446.2:p.Val1941Ala|5982|5822|1941|V/A|gTt/gCt|||-1||HGNC|9957|||||ENSP00000388446||Q75MM8&J3KQ66|UPI0001AE70CE||Ensembl|A|A||deleterious|possibly_damaging|hmmpanther:PTHR11841||||||0.175|6.07|6.07|0.32053|0.994000|8.947000|1.00|6.538|10.425|5.526|6.534|-3.539|0.336|-3.203|-3.203|-5.122|-1.830|-3.897|-6.952||||281632|Uncertain_significance|281632|criteria_provided&_multiple_submitters&_no_conflicts|,G|missense_variant|MODERATE|RELN|ENSG00000189056|Transcript|ENST00000428762|protein_coding|39/65||ENST00000428762.1:c.5822T>C|ENSP00000392423.1:p.Val1941Ala|5982|5822|1941|V/A|gTt/gCt|||-1||HGNC|9957|YES|||CCDS47680.1|ENSP00000392423|P78509|Q75MM8|UPI00001678BC||Ensembl|A|A||deleterious|benign|hmmpanther:PTHR11841||||||0.175|6.07|6.07|0.32053|0.994000|8.947000|1.00|6.538|10.425|5.526|6.534|-3.539|0.336|-3.203|-3.203|-5.122|-1.830|-3.897|-6.952||||281632|Uncertain_significance|281632|criteria_provided&_multiple_submitters&_no_conflicts|,G|missense_variant|MODERATE|RELN|5649|Transcript|NM_005045.3|protein_coding|39/65||NM_005045.3:c.5822T>C|NP_005036.2:p.Val1941Ala|5982|5822|1941|V/A|gTt/gCt|||-1||EntrezGene|9957|YES||||NP_005036.2|||||RefSeq|A|A||deleterious|benign|||||||0.175|6.07|6.07|0.32053|0.994000|8.947000|1.00|6.538|10.425|5.526|6.534|-3.539|0.336|-3.203|-3.203|-5.122|-1.830|-3.897|-6.952||||281632|Uncertain_significance|281632|criteria_provided&_multiple_submitters&_no_conflicts|,G|missense_variant|MODERATE|RELN|5649|Transcript|NM_173054.2|protein_coding|39/64||NM_173054.2:c.5822T>C|NP_774959.1:p.Val1941Ala|5982|5822|1941|V/A|gTt/gCt|||-1||EntrezGene|9957|||||NP_774959.1|||||RefSeq|A|A||deleterious|benign|||||||0.175|6.07|6.07|0.32053|0.994000|8.947000|1.00|6.538|10.425|5.526|6.534|-3.539|0.336|-3.203|-3.203|-5.122|-1.830|-3.897|-6.952||||281632|Uncertain_significance|281632|criteria_provided&_multiple_submitters&_no_conflicts|;Compounds=keentroll:7_103317537_G_T>23|7_103617757_C_CA>8|7_103424513_C_T>9|7_103456977_A_AACACACACACACAC>24|7_103317546_G_C>24|7_103560513_A_C>4|7_103565432_TACACATACAC_T>10|7_103520883_C_T>11|7_103132200_T_C>9|7_103465074_AGTGTGTGT_A>8|7_103508295_A_AT>11|7_103627810_G_A>9|7_103560517_A_G>3|7_103560519_AC_A>4|7_103148602_A_G>9|7_103479750_C_CTTTTT>8|7_103560515_A_G>3|7_103560532_ATGTG_A>6|7_103129650_G_GGTGTGTGTGTGT>8|7_103502856_T_TTCTA>9|7_103478655_CAAAAA_C>8|7_103512743_A_C>9|7_103560530_G_A>4|7_103357927_C_CA>9|7_103271733_C_CTT>16|7_103333797_T_TG>9|7_103566546_CT_C>8|7_103580800_C_T>9|7_103132297_TCTCTCTCACACACACACACA_T>8|7_103466766_AATGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGT_A>9|7_103466268_G_A>9|7_103560525_TTG_T>4|7_103531571_C_T>9|7_103511405_T_G>9|7_103123991_T_C>9|7_103396065_T_A>9|7_103332129_G_A>9|7_103132355_G_T>9|7_103317547_C_A>24|7_103500085_T_A>9|7_103547861_GGAA_G>11|7_103232073_T_C>24|7_103360620_T_TTG>8|7_103484361_C_G>9|7_103550193_T_TATATATTAAATATATATATTTAATATATATAA>22|7_103560516_T_TGGTCGCC>4|7_103615962_GTATTTATTTATT_G>23|7_103374946_G_C>11|7_103128672_C_G>9|7_103404667_T_G>9;DB;DP=108;ExcessHet=3.0103;FS=0;GNOMADAF=0.00050942;GNOMADAF_popmax=0.0007776;GeneticModels=keentroll:AR_comp|AR_comp_dn;MLEAC=2;MLEAF=0.333;MQ=60;MQRankSum=0;ModelScore=keentroll:61;Obs=3;QD=15.66;RankResult=2|2|0|1|5|3|3|3|1|1;RankScore=keentroll:15;ReadPosRankSum=0.054;SOR=0.652;SPIDEX=0.399;SWEGENAAC_Hemi=0;SWEGENAAC_Het=2;SWEGENAAC_Hom=0;SWEGENAF=0.001;VQSLOD=21.72;culprit=MQ;most_severe_consequence=9957:G|missense_variant GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:21,19:40:99:640,0,810 0/1:22,16:38:99:592,0,860 0/0:29,0:29:61:0,61,1182
Could be that, but the actual HTML code on the variant page is also gone
Or not! Wait
😸 Huh? No?

Yes, it was there all the time. Must be a parsing problem
Still, I'm not so sure I'm right either: the vep97 demo example also has those CLINVAR_CLNSIG CSQ:s.
Demo case is still on the INFO CLNSIG though..
If the MIP folks confirm this is the way they annotate CLINVAR now, we could presumably just add those csq keys to the clinvar parsing?
The VCF and the parsing class do use different keys, yes:

But the analyses already in scout are missing the info now
Ok @4WGH - thanks a bunch for the report! Golden! 👍🏻
It would seem a recent change to how ClinVar entries are represented from MIP was not compatible with Scout. We will wait for confirmation from @henrikstranneheim, investigate exactly how far back this goes and how far reaching the consequences are. Hopefully we will have some news on this in the afternoon!
Hi there,
In MIP8 we annotate clinvar variants using vep. vep required that we added an extra identifier to indicate the source. That's why CLINVAR_.... It's unfortunate that the information didn't reach the scout team :(
I'm opening a PR with the fix now, but might have to re-run cases!