Roslyn-analyzers: Port FxCop rule CA1704: IdentifiersShouldBeSpelledCorrectly

Created on 21 Nov 2015  路  4Comments  路  Source: dotnet/roslyn-analyzers

Title: Identifiers should be spelled correctly

Description:

The name of an externally visible identifier contains one or more words that are not recognized by the Microsoft spelling checker library.

Dependency: NamingService

Notes:

See if StyleCop has implemented it

Area-Text.Analyzers Blocked FxCop-Port FxCop-Port-Blocked-NamingService

Most helpful comment

We would be interested in how far this is along and if this will ever be implemented, as according to this PR comment it's being considered to use a different approach or at least use a different CA Rule then originally. Has there been any internal discussions and decisions about the issue of spell checking with the Roslyn analyzers or is the decision making progress currently postponed?

We would be glad to not have to use a third party tool to achieve this functionality, but this depends on how long we would have to wait for this rule.

All 4 comments

We would be interested in how far this is along and if this will ever be implemented, as according to this PR comment it's being considered to use a different approach or at least use a different CA Rule then originally. Has there been any internal discussions and decisions about the issue of spell checking with the Roslyn analyzers or is the decision making progress currently postponed?

We would be glad to not have to use a third party tool to achieve this functionality, but this depends on how long we would have to wait for this rule.

Any ETA for this one?

Hi @lgolding, @mavasani,

still no ETA for this one? This rule is very important for us!

EvilPingu

May be fixed by #1111

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

stephentoub picture stephentoub  路  3Comments

onyxmaster picture onyxmaster  路  3Comments

Youssef1313 picture Youssef1313  路  4Comments

Grauenwolf picture Grauenwolf  路  3Comments

paulomorgado picture paulomorgado  路  3Comments