| Name | Type | Version | Enabled | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon.co.uk | extension | 1.3 | true | [email protected] |
| Bing | extension | 1.2 | true | [email protected] |
| Chambers (UK) | extension | 1.0 | true | [email protected] |
| Dark Reader | extension | 4.9.21 | true | [email protected] |
| DuckDuckGo | extension | 1.1 | true | [email protected] |
| DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials | extension | 2020.10.2 | true | jid1-ZAdIEUB7XOzOJw@jetpack |
| eBay | extension | 1.2 | true | [email protected] |
| ExpressVPN: VPN proxy to unblock everything | extension | 4.9.4.3713 | true | [email protected] |
| Firefox Multi-Account Containers | extension | 7.1.0 | true | @testpilot-containers |
| extension | 1.1 | true | [email protected] | |
| Privacy Badger | extension | 2020.10.7 | true | jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ@jetpack |
| uBlock Origin | extension | 1.30.2 | true | [email protected] |
| Wikipedia (en) | extension | 1.1 | true | [email protected] |
I open a 'Personal' container and log into gmail.com. I open another 'Personal' container and visit youtube.com and discover that I'm now logged into my Google account there.
To visit youtube.com in another 'Personal' container should not result in me being logged into a Google account within that container. i.e. I should be a non-logged in/anonymous user as far as YouTube is concerned.
I might be misunderstanding you, but it reads to me like things works as advertised:
The "Personal" and "Personal" windows/tabs are one container, not two, they can share cookies and such data. Therefore if you want two sites to not be able to do this you need two different containers, such as Mail and Media. Log in to Gmail in Mail and the open YouTube in Media and now Google should not be able to follow you into the second container.
Ahhh. OK I definitely misunderstood what a 'container' represented then in the context of this Firefox plugin.
I presumed that each 'personal' tab opened was a _new_/_unique_ container instance (so although they both would be grouped by the category of 'personal' they would be isolated -- which I now understand is incorrect 🤦♂️)
@Integralist I think this issue can be closed. Can you do that?
@Integralist You may want to checkout Temporary Containers. It's by one of this extensions' maintainers, @stoically!
Thanks all!
Most helpful comment
Ahhh. OK I definitely misunderstood what a 'container' represented then in the context of this Firefox plugin.
I presumed that each 'personal' tab opened was a _new_/_unique_ container instance (so although they both would be grouped by the category of 'personal' they would be isolated -- which I now understand is incorrect 🤦♂️)