https://twitter.com/zerbembasqwibo/status/775691447374872576?p=v
Tell us what happens
Tell us what should happen instead
Mapper Version:
Operating System:
Two words in the title, a link to another page, the guiding template ignored: Not a particular helpful report.
It is a known issue that there are differences in rendering between completely different software. For reference here is an overlay of your images. It is unknown to me if there are any special points on the contour which is rendered differently. However, the mapper rendering doesn't look inappropriate, so maybe the issue is in the other product...

@dg0yt, its not my twitter, I only found this tweet and post it for review.
So it is not your issue, and you don't even take the time to find out if it is a known issue, if the person who posted the picture on twitter is actively reporting issues here, or if you can do some analysis yourself. This issue is just noise which takes away precious time for developing and for supporting users which report issues they encounter in real projects, and that's why I am willing to (temporarily) ban users which create such noise.
@dg0yt, Some users still don't know where post issues (too young or don't registered on Github, etc.) and them mostly use twitter.
I can't check is it known issue or not, because I'm not a project owner, I'm tester and contributor.
That's why I post twitter link for review by project owners.
That's all.
@Symbian9 did You try to translate the message from twitter? Simple copy-paste to to google translate results in:
Why renders @OCADAG #OCAD 12 viewer maps so ugly compared to #OOM OpenOrienteering Mapper? Choppy.
Then You would know that the OP is unhappy about OCAD viewer rendering, and not about OOM.
Please, If you want to submit a bug report, at least put a little effort into it.
Dear, @nalajcie
I'm a Contributor of OpenOrienteering project since 2012.
I no need your bolded comments.
I posted it for Members of this project, and already got reply from them.
@Symbian9 I guess all of us watching this project would like you stop the noise.
It seams like bold comments are needed.
Dear, @Abbe98
My comment addressed to @nalajcie, and not to you.
@Symbian9 We fully understand what you are saying and to whom. But you don't seem to get our message:
Shift focus from quantity to quality.
Enough said. Topic closed.
Most helpful comment
@Symbian9 did You try to translate the message from twitter? Simple copy-paste to to google translate results in:
Then You would know that the OP is unhappy about OCAD viewer rendering, and not about OOM.
Please, If you want to submit a bug report, at least put a little effort into it.