Adapt_framework: update to underscore v1.9.x?
looks like it has a few useful new additions...
http://underscorejs.org/#1.9.0
moloko
All 7 comments
Should we move to lodash instead? .... it should be much faster than underscore.
lc-thomasberger
on 23 Apr 2018
lodash vs all.
lodash does have much extended functionality.
underscore usage is in decline.
lodash definitely probably fully supports backbone.
oliverfoster
on 23 Apr 2018
Have done a quick test of Underscore v1.9.0 in FF, IE11 and iOS11 (iPad) and all seems for the OOTB content - but since I can see that a couple of bugs have already been logged against Underscore v1.9.0 we may as well wait for the v1.9.1 release just to be on the safe side
As agreed in the weekly standup let's park switching to lodash for a future major release
moloko
on 24 Apr 2018
Ready when you are, @moloko.
tomgreenfield
on 2 Jul 2018
lodash vs breaks with underscore btw. i found out to my detriment the other day. no pluck only map. (i know you're not talking lodash @tomgreenfield, just wanted to say they broken the compatibility whilst i remember.)
oliverfoster
on 2 Jul 2018
So the idea is to go to v1.9.1?
brian-learningpool
on 2 Jul 2018
@brian-learningpool that's the plan. We're currently on v1.8.3 (released April 2015!) and v1.9.1 is the latest version.
I'll give it a quick test against OOTB adapt first in a few browsers and report back, we can decide whether to proceed or not from there.
moloko
on 2 Jul 2018
Related issues
sarveshwar-gavhane
路
5Comments
moloko
路
4Comments
chris-steele
路
6Comments
canstudios-louisem
路
3Comments
joe-replin
路
5Comments
Most helpful comment
Have done a quick test of Underscore v1.9.0 in FF, IE11 and iOS11 (iPad) and all seems for the OOTB content - but since I can see that a couple of bugs have already been logged against Underscore v1.9.0 we may as well wait for the v1.9.1 release just to be on the safe side
As agreed in the weekly standup let's park switching to lodash for a future major release