I noticed a few minor issues when looking at the draft website, some (all?) of which are probably common to the previous version. I don't think any are blocking.
/jsoc/jsocalt set (I can help fill these in later). I haven't tried it with a screen reader yet but will give it a spin tomorrow. Let me know if I should file this in the main website repo instead.
Awesome feedback. I used Tota11y (create by Khan Academy) and seemed to resolve all the warnings it had. What sort of software are you using to get these suggestions? I am unclear right now what the status of this repo and the other Pull Request are.
Thanks, this is very useful. But this doesn't seem to block https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/pull/544 so maybe this can be done post merge.
Yeah, that鈥檚 what Alex said too. We can tackle this after the merge.
The new and squarier Revise logo is ready to go (https://github.com/timholy/Revise.jl/pull/413) but I thought it would be better to wait until the dust has settled a bit.
@cormullion We can get the new revise logo in.
Bump? (https://github.com/timholy/Revise.jl/pull/413#issuecomment-582077222)
This should be updated.
Regarding 3. and 4, those are just buttons provided by GitHub. It's not really something made specifically for julialang.org.
It would be good to go through and do an alt text audit. That seems like it should be simple to do. Also, if we can have a CI give a warning on images that lack alt text that'd be great to keep up quality.