Updated on March 8 to broaden scope beyond just Stores on WordPress.com. This really applies to any site.
Proposed Tasks:
See also:
https://github.com/Automattic/wp-calypso/issues/22624 Front-of-site privacy banners
Detailed Requirements:
It would be good to have a dedicated view for a user to manage their site's privacy policy. With GDPR and CalOPPA (and other laws) privacy policies are a must-have for a modern web site.
Beyond a simple page editor, the view could
Places like Settings > Traffic > Google Analytics could link out to this view (i.e. when someone activates GA, they will want to update their privacy policy to mention it.
Features like Business Plan > Store on WordPress.com could also "link out" to this view.
Could perhaps leverage this: https://github.com/GDPRWP/standard/issues/5
Sounds like we need this for new sites:
And this for existing sites:
Does that sound right?
provide prefab "blocks" for things that are active on the site (e.g. stats, google analytics, jetpack, etc.)
Could you explain this further? Where would these blocks live?
Does that sound right?
IANAL, but that sounds like a good start
provide prefab "blocks" for things that are active on the site (e.g. stats, google analytics, jetpack, etc.)
I _think_ these "blocks" could maybe be (read-only?) paragraphs/bullet points from each of those plugins, that, if the plugin/feature is enabled, gets automatically added to the site's policy, something along the lines of what I've proposed in https://github.com/GDPRWP/standard/issues/5
In other words, the "blocks" would be translated text that lives in those plugins and is hooked by those plugins into special shortcodes embedded in the various sections of the doc and/or exposed via some "policy builder" UX in calypso. The possibility of Gutenberg blocks for those blocks also crossed my mind (see what i did there?).
And even though some things like "WordPress.com stats" aren't a plugin per se, things like that could use the same framework to report out on how they collect and use visitor data.
Ah, interesting. I think we might have to stick with shortcodes to start, until Gutenberg comes around.
IANAL, but that sounds like a good start
I'll wait to hear back from our legal team to see if we need anything else. Otherwise, this feels fairly straight forward from a design perspective.
The ideal solution will
Related GDPR articles: 7, 13, 14
This issue has been marked as stale and will be closed in seven days. This happened because:
You can keep the issue open by adding a comment. If you do, please provide additional context and explain why you’d like it to remain open. You can also close the issue yourself — if you do, please add a brief explanation.
Most helpful comment
Sounds like we need this for new sites:
And this for existing sites:
Does that sound right?
Could you explain this further? Where would these blocks live?