Describe the bug
When i look the commands available on Zowe Explorer to work with MVS and TSO commands, i see only MVS Commands are available now, even on the description we have both appearing to be the same

To Reproduce

Expected behavior
Expected to have one entry for MVS Command and one for TSO
Screenshots
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Additional context
@zFernand0 @zdmullen Maybe we do not have to change the "Issue Command" Text. If we click Issue Command then a dialog box will appear. Choose TSO or MVS Command? What do you think?
That might be a good way to handle it for now. What do you think @zFernand0 ?
Thanks, Jelly.
I like the idea, even though people may not want to have an extra step to issue the command.
Would be nice if there was a way to include two buttons in the dialog. (just thinking out loud, not sure if it's possible) :yum:
+1 to @zFernand0. I actually got an e-mail from a customer this morning asking whether they could submit TSO commands, and if there was a way to just punch out TSO or MVS commands with a single click that'd be great with two buttons in the dialog.
One thing that would be great, although I know it's much more work, is to have a TSO console similar to a Terminal, so that against a profile there would be a right mouse click "Open TSO Terminal" that would open a terminal window at the bottom where a user could just issue TSO commands. Likewise for USS commands that connect through SSH. That way long running commands could be issued, history could be recalled, and more, ...
I'm not sure everyone would like an extra step to issue a TSO command. I'd lobby to keep them separate command groups.
I think it's likely that users would be able to run TSO commands, but less likely to have authority to issue system commands. In that scenario, they'll be presented with a choice they don't have.
@dkelosky Is there a possibility to identify MVS and TSO commands? is it the /? If there is an identifier then we can just have one button and the code will manage it.
Hmmm, that's a cool idea. It would model SDSF or CA SYSVIEW behavior where system commands are prefixed with /. But, in a "real" console or CA Remote Console, you don't prefix system commands with a /.
Joe's terminal idea is also cool; perhaps it's a separate issue though 馃槃 .
I suppose in fairness, you must also prefix TSO commands in SYSVIEW, e.g. tso time...
prefix with TSO could be a good way to identify it... and people are used to that when working on it so would be easy...
@billpereira that's a possibility.
@dkelosky What do you think?
From a READY prompt you don't need to prefix TSO commands and from a console you don't need to prefix. Depending on the interface you're using, you must prefix, e.g. SYSVIEW - xmvs ir / for console commands.
Perhaps the cleanest approach is to have an [Issue] TSO Command and [Issue] Console Command? Some users won't have authority to use the Console command group, so it might be easier for them to only run TSO commands without needing to prefix?
Hey @billpereira I have attached this issue to the PR https://github.com/zowe/vscode-extension-for-zowe/pull/1230 addressing what is shown in the command pallet with the search for issue, for the addition of TSO in Zowe Explorer we will be bringing that functionality in following issue https://github.com/zowe/vscode-extension-for-zowe/issues/684 and adding it, and the MVS command, to the APIs so extenders can consume the functionality as well
Most helpful comment
From a
READYprompt you don't need to prefix TSO commands and from a console you don't need to prefix. Depending on the interface you're using, you must prefix, e.g. SYSVIEW -xmvsir/for console commands.Perhaps the cleanest approach is to have an
[Issue] TSO Commandand[Issue] Console Command? Some users won't have authority to use the Console command group, so it might be easier for them to only run TSO commands without needing to prefix?