I've discovered the issue while using a custom search engine, Prisjakt. The issue persist on the UK version Pricespy. When replacing %s
with the search terms provided, Vimium inserts a +
(encoded: %2B
) between all words. This is fine for many engines, but some, such as this, provides different results when using a space /
%20
versus using a plus +
/%2B
.
And for this site, using spaces provides better search results than using plus-signs.
A similar issue has been raised previously in #1334, but the fix introduced in #1384 introduced the +
that's creating this difference.
p: https://pricespy.co.uk/#rparams=ss=%s Pricespy
p playstation 4
in the vomnibarplaystation+4
.playstation 4
changes the results (for the better).Use spaces (%20
) as separators for search terms. Not sure how this will affect other search engines.
Allow users to choose between tow searchterm variables: %s
and %S
, where one inserts plus-signs and the other spaces as separators.
Allow users to specify a custom separator for their custom search engine, i.e. as p: https://pricespy.co.uk/#rparams=ss=%s ( ) Pricespy
, where ( )
specifies the separator (here, spaces).
10.0.15063
59.0.3071.115
1.59
Suggested solution 1 is probably a non-starter; for sure it would break stuff for other users.
Solution 2 is an interesting idea.
Solution 3 seems most general.
Let's leave this for a bit and see if anybody else reports the same or similar issues.
You may try my Vimium++ (renamed to Vimium C) (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/vimium-c/hfjbmagddngcpeloejdejnfgbamkjaeg), and it support %s
or %S
(aka $s
, $S
) to use +
or (space)
- %S
means to concat URL using raw spaces.
Besides, it supports a simple "template" syntax:
$S{_}
means to concat query words using _
, and so does $S{/}
$S{$1/$2}
means only to concat the first word and the second one using raw /
, and $11, $12, ... are also OKay$S{ + }
to concat using (space)+(space)
For example, an engine of v.sum|sum\::聽vimium://eval\聽$S{\聽+\聽}聽re=聽Calculate
allows you to get sum of all words by typing v.sum 1 2 3 4
@gdh1995 Yes, this might be exactly what I'm looking for! Thank you. I will give this a try, it seems to solve this particular problem perfectly.
I would prefer to use the official Vimium client, but if this becomes an issue I frequently run across I will consider a change.
I vote for Solution 2
Fixed in #3136.
Most helpful comment
Fixed in #3136.