References are currently inconsistent - going forward it might be nice to agree to one style.
Pick a referencing style - please vote below
Any others that people like?
Everyone to stop this being a librarian fight!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing.
Looks like Jupyter-book supports automatic formatting of references, which would make this much easier: the ref style would be a single configuration setting somewhere and it would be consistent across the whole project.
Downside is that it would be a little less obvious how to cite for new contributors so I'm not going to advocate for it unequivocally.
The general process would be:
{% cite holdgraf_evidence_2014 %} generates this citation: (Holdgraf, de Heer, Pasley, & Knight, 2014).Thoughts?
@masonlr and @cassgvp will attempt this as a proof of concept for a chapter
We are looking at a central Zotero group to store all book references.
Here is the existing Zotero group, it just needs a LOT of updating: https://www.zotero.org/groups/2252438/the_turing_way
We're planning to add bibtex referencing to the Research Data Management chapter as a test. If this works well, we'll roll it out to all chapters.
Thinking that just editing the .bib file checked in to this github repo will reduce a lot of the complexity. You can then use whatever local bibtex application you want, edit the bibtex directly, etc.
Successfully completed the proof of concept yesterday (@masonlr smashed out the process, I found references!) and it was looking sweet on a local (docker) build of the book! Next steps are to: 1) write up the procedure for authors in CONTRIBUTING.md; 2) scour through the existing content and fix the current references (maybe a separate issue for new contributors).
@cassgvp we can pick this up on PR https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/the-turing-way/pull/623
The references show up okay on the netlify preview, so this method should 'just work'.


OMG, you are superstars :sparkles: - this is amazing!
Most helpful comment
Successfully completed the proof of concept yesterday (@masonlr smashed out the process, I found references!) and it was looking sweet on a local (docker) build of the book! Next steps are to: 1) write up the procedure for authors in CONTRIBUTING.md; 2) scour through the existing content and fix the current references (maybe a separate issue for new contributors).