Many popular styles name has long size,stylus Default Popup width is 246 px too short?
like :
Google - Custom background (16 images or your own)
Colourful Youtube Theme [Pick your own colors]
Facebook blue City lights - by -Royal-Style-

i suggest set Default Popup width to 456 px


@schomery, @narcolepticinsomniac, what about removing the size option entirely and instead use auto-width? It will simplify both the code and UX.
body {
max-width: 800px; /* Chrome restriction */
font-size: 12px;
font-family: Arial,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,sans-serif;
}
#popup-options {
padding: 1.2em 0;
white-space: nowrap;
}
#popup-options button {
margin: 0 2px;
}
I can easily tell what each ellipsed style title is. We've already widened the default a bit, because it made sense, but I think we should avoid making it huge by default. On 1024px, or even 1366px, 800px will be ridiculous looking. Regardless of performance, it will feel bloated and slow. I also don't particularly like the idea of it being a different size every time it's opened. Not only would I dislike the inconsistency, but what happens when you delete a style with a really long title? It goes from 800px to 250px while your using it?
I've always considered the general consensus to be, to keep it as compact as possible while sill adequately accommodating all the functionality comfortably. Obviously, at least a couple people here feel differently, but I still think that the number of users who'd prefer a, possibly 800px wide popup, would be in the minority.
Since we have an integrated user option for this, it's really all about what the best default is. I think it's pretty good where it's at, so my vote would be against a popup with an inconsistent width that would occasionally inflate to be nearly 3/4 of my viewport width.
i still think width auto-size is the best way,in firefox stylish is auto-size,
seems in chrome(1.5.2) is same too.so,why do not keep the stylish old habit?
fixed size is good but not enough
I would say let's keep the default size and allow auto-sizing in the options page. Like if width is set to zero, auto-sizing is enabled.
Few notes:
max-width: 800px; /* Chrome restriction */ to the body anyway.The size it's currently at is great, it's preferred by me because it's small and compact but just large enough to know what I'm doing. I doubt many people will have more than two styles going at any given time. Also, you're allowed to customize it and it's incredibly simple to find it.
I would say let's keep the default size and allow auto-sizing in the options page. Like if width is set to zero, auto-sizing is enabled.
Not something I particularly care about, but this appears to have been forgotten. Zero isn't an option, nor should it be, but an option for auto seemed a decent compromise at the time.
The problem with autosizing is that the width is not known on first paint so the popup will either flicker or animate each time.
Most helpful comment
I can easily tell what each ellipsed style title is. We've already widened the default a bit, because it made sense, but I think we should avoid making it huge by default. On 1024px, or even 1366px, 800px will be ridiculous looking. Regardless of performance, it will feel bloated and slow. I also don't particularly like the idea of it being a different size every time it's opened. Not only would I dislike the inconsistency, but what happens when you delete a style with a really long title? It goes from 800px to 250px while your using it?
I've always considered the general consensus to be, to keep it as compact as possible while sill adequately accommodating all the functionality comfortably. Obviously, at least a couple people here feel differently, but I still think that the number of users who'd prefer a, possibly 800px wide popup, would be in the minority.
Since we have an integrated user option for this, it's really all about what the best default is. I think it's pretty good where it's at, so my vote would be against a popup with an inconsistent width that would occasionally inflate to be nearly 3/4 of my viewport width.