Stackage: Module documentation broken for some packages in lts-9.1

Created on 18 Aug 2017  路  6Comments  路  Source: commercialhaskell/stackage

In looking around at the docs for lts-9.1 some packages that normally have documentation just have the There are no documented modules for this package. message. Ex:

https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.1/package/aeson-1.1.2.0
https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.1/package/opaleye-0.5.4.0
https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.1/package/scotty-0.11.0

Which all had module documentation in lts-9.0 (even on the same verision of the package)

https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.0/package/aeson-1.1.2.0
https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.0/package/opaleye-0.5.3.0
https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.0/package/scotty-0.11.0

It doesn't appear to be every package though as some still have module docs (ex. https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.1/package/bytestring-0.10.8.1)

Most helpful comment

FYI, the lts-9.1 specific links are still broken (hopefully DB update will fix that), but visiting /package/name will deliver the most recently generated docs now.

All 6 comments

Thank you for the report!

There were a bunch of issues generating docs for this snapshot so attempted to regenerate everything from scratch, maybe I did that in a bad way.

I ran into this problem as well. The scientific package has documentation for LTS 9.0 but not 9.1:
https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.0/package/scientific-0.3.5.1
https://www.stackage.org/lts-9.1/package/scientific-0.3.5.1

This is bad. Stackage docs have been reliable for as long as I can remember. Not having them makes Stackage look as bad as Hackage.

Thanks for the report. Looks like a cron job failure most likely, but it's possible that there was a generation error. Either way, I'll update the server code in the next week to always display the most recently generated documentation.

FYI, the lts-9.1 specific links are still broken (hopefully DB update will fix that), but visiting /package/name will deliver the most recently generated docs now.

Thank you for jumping on this @snoyberg. I really appreciate it :)

Well, I'll close this one off now since we're moving past LTS-9.1 馃憤

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

bergmark picture bergmark  路  3Comments

legrostdg picture legrostdg  路  7Comments

alexeyzab picture alexeyzab  路  4Comments

juhp picture juhp  路  6Comments

asr picture asr  路  7Comments