Shadowsocks-windows: 编译成64位代理无法工作，32位没问题
编译成64位代理无法工作，32位没问题，应该是个bug
fifc
All 15 comments
因为有些外部的native dll库是32位的，所以64位的主程序在调用这些库的时候会产生问题
celeron533
on 6 Feb 2018
有同样问题，无法编译。
请支持，如果64位没有存在价值，为什么都系统升级64位了呢。
不支持就不支持，low就low，别瞎扯。
avatar21
on 17 May 2018
你好，这个其实是原生库的问题，Shadowsocks for Windows使用了一些第三方库，而这些库没有提供64位版本，并非Shadowsocks for Windows自身的问题。
chenshaoju
on 17 May 2018
所用第三方库不都是开源的吗？编译个64位版本出来应该是可行的啊！
fifc
on 19 May 2018
@avatar21 @fifc
pull requests are welcome
Here is opensource community, you can do anything on the code as you wish without any payment.
For the 3rd party components, you could also sent pull requests to their project repository to make their project x64 compatible or give a x64 compiler profile at least. Also a simplified regression test may necessary to make sure the x64 build profile and artifact did not break any functions which is quite common to happen in native programs such as written in C, C++, GO, etc.
celeron533
on 19 May 2018
actually i mean what specific pkg lacks of 64 port?
fifc
on 19 May 2018
@fifc I checked the external referenced, almost all the packages has 64bit binary builds. 😅
If has 32bit and 64bit builds in release:
- There is no significant performance improvement as @wongsyrone mentioned.
- Slightly added more maintenance work.
- User need to know which version they need to download.
celeron533
on 30 May 2018
If all the external have a 64-bit version package, why not release two versions? After all, this is the future trend.
Vndroid
on 7 Oct 2019
Maybe we can have an 'All CPU' version by drop native 3rd-party library?
ghost
on 28 Nov 2019
@studentmain
or we can have both x86 and x64 native library and used corresponding ones by platform.
celeron533
on 28 Nov 2019
maybe it is safe to drop 32bit support. it is not likely that a 32bit old pc need to run ss
fifc
on 1 Dec 2019
为时尚早，现在还有不少的Win7 32位机。明年或者后年再考虑丢弃32位比较合适。不过我还是倾向于any cpu。any cpu几乎唯一的阻碍是libsscrypto.dll，其他的原生组件都可以（在合理缩减一些功能后）丢弃。
ghost
on 1 Dec 2019
为时尚早，现在还有不少的Win7 32位机。明年或者后年再考虑丢弃32位比较合适。不过我还是倾向于any cpu。any cpu几乎唯一的阻碍是libsscrypto.dll，其他的原生组件都可以（在合理缩减一些功能后）丢弃。
Tell me about it! Let's do it(drop 32bit) one month later. lol
Vndroid
on 1 Dec 2019
看来可以考虑，明年迁移到 .NET 5
Stzx
on 1 Dec 2019
2833 有 All CPU 目标了
ghost
on 22 Mar 2020
Related issues
zjylx
·
3Comments
wenjiping
·
3Comments
ugksoft
·
3Comments
spectereye
·
4Comments
tiliarou
·
3Comments
Most helpful comment
If all the external have a 64-bit version package, why not release two versions? After all, this is the future trend.