Let's say a userscript only works on user profiles. The current match would currently be https://scratch.mit.edu/users/*/, why not just userprofile? And other potential filters for common use.
I believe it's too late to implement this. It's not a big deal, either. Closing
too late
I believe this one is worth reopening. Once we implement #390, addons that work on the editor/project page would also need to work on turbowarp's editor/project page. If we simply said for the match URL to be project, then we could have the match URL patterns for both turbowarp and scratch to link to htpps://scratch.mit.edu/projects/* and https://turbowarp.org/* (excluding the https://turbowarp.org/privacy.html page). And, if we end up supporting addons on another site, then it would be useful there too. This would also help with #646. And I think it's just easier if all the user needed to add in their addon, was just search or user
And phosphorous
From: TheColaber notifications@github.com
Sent: Friday, January 1, 2021 9:58 AM
To: ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons ScratchAddons@noreply.github.com
Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons] More options for userscript matches (not only URLs) (#23)
I believe this one is worth reopening. Once we implement #390https://github.com/ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons/issues/390, addons that work on the editor/project page would also need to work on turbowarp's editor/project page. If we simply said for the match URL to be project, then we could have the match URL patterns for both turbowarp and scratch to link to htpps://scratch.mit.edu/projects/* and https://turbowarp.org/* (excluding the https://turbowarp.org/privacy.html page). And, if we end up supporting addons on another site, then it would be useful there too. This would also help with #646https://github.com/ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons/issues/646. And I think it's just easier if all the user needed to add in their addon, was just search or user
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons/issues/23#issuecomment-753332609, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOT5DEQDTPZ3DOJW64VZXWLSXXWKLANCNFSM4PL5ILKA.
I believe this one is worth reopening. Once we implement #390, addons that work on the editor/project page would also need to work on turbowarp's editor/project page. If we simply said for the match URL to be
project, then we could have the match URL patterns for both turbowarp and scratch to link to htpps://scratch.mit.edu/projects/* and https://turbowarp.org/* (excluding the https://turbowarp.org/privacy.html page). And, if we end up supporting addons on another site, then it would be useful there too. This would also help with #646. And I think it's just easier if all the user needed to add in their addon, was justsearchoruser
I honestly doubt userscript made for the Scratch editor could work "as-is" on TurboWarp, so it wouldn't make sense to merge both origins into one permission - an addon might only work on the Scratch editor
Well maybe userstyles
Paul Reid
From: World_Languages notifications@github.com
Sent: Friday, January 1, 2021 3:15:04 PM
To: ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons ScratchAddons@noreply.github.com
Cc: Paul Reid paul@reid-family.org; Comment comment@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons] More options for userscript matches (not only URLs) (#23)
I believe this one is worth reopening. Once we implement #390https://github.com/ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons/issues/390, addons that work on the editor/project page would also need to work on turbowarp's editor/project page. If we simply said for the match URL to be project, then we could have the match URL patterns for both turbowarp and scratch to link to htpps://scratch.mit.edu/projects/* and https://turbowarp.org/* (excluding the https://turbowarp.org/privacy.html page). And, if we end up supporting addons on another site, then it would be useful there too. This would also help with #646https://github.com/ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons/issues/646. And I think it's just easier if all the user needed to add in their addon, was just search or user
I honestly doubt userscript made for the Scratch editor could work "as-is" on TurboWarp, so it wouldn't make sense to merge both origins into one permission - an addon might only work on the Scratch editor
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ScratchAddons/ScratchAddons/issues/23#issuecomment-753383169, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOT5DESCRGJABLPA6US4W6TSXY3NRANCNFSM4PL5ILKA.
I honestly doubt userscript made for the Scratch editor could work "as-is" on TurboWarp, so it wouldn't make sense to merge both origins into one permission - an addon might only work on the Scratch editor
I'm sure that most do, and some (like project-notes-tabs) could easily be fixed by adding an if statement to not run at all.
Most helpful comment