the get_similar_cases call was renamed in the case adapter in august - did we miss one call or have we messed with the history?
2020-12-15 14:50:53,294 - scout.server.app - ERROR: Exception on /cust003/gene_variants [POST] [in /home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/app.py:1892]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 2447, in wsgi_app
response = self.full_dispatch_request()
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1952, in full_dispatch_request
rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1821, in handle_user_exception
reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/_compat.py", line 39, in reraise
raise value
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1950, in full_dispatch_request
rv = self.dispatch_request()
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/miniconda/envs/prod/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1936, in dispatch_request
return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/SERVER/apps/scout/git/scout/scout/server/utils.py", line 24, in decorated_function
context = func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/SERVER/apps/scout/git/scout/scout/server/blueprints/institutes/views.py", line 218, in gene_variants
query=form.data, institute_id=institute_id, category="snv", variant_type=variant_type
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/SERVER/apps/scout/git/scout/scout/adapter/mongo/variant.py", line 326, in gene_variants
variant_type=variant_type,
File "/home/hiseq.clinical/SERVER/apps/scout/git/scout/scout/adapter/mongo/query.py", line 140, in build_variant_query
similar_cases = self.get_similar_cases(case_obj)
AttributeError: 'MongoAdapter' object has no attribute 'get_similar_cases'
Are you working on this @dnil? Otherwise I could check
I was just checking it out, but feel free - it may simply just be an oversight from it was renamed, but got me a little nervous.. 馃槃
Yes it's weird, but we might simply have forgotten to rename all occurrences, let's see
Yes, I think we just forgot that call. It's a search that is not used often, that's why we see the bug for the first time now!
Yeah, its stuff like that that makes me worried about deleting indexes etc. Anyway, good; I'll have a look later!