MK3S
3.9.1-RC1
Octoprint
Following installation of 3.9.1 RC1 I received an M112 when driving the printer from OctoPrint
Pi 4
Octoprint : 1.4.2
baud rate : 115200
1metre USB cable.
Hello there
I'll need more information than this. Please upload the Serial log when it fails connecting.
Also, please try to enable the "wait for start" option in octoprint.
Did the issue happen when connecting or when printing? If it's on startup, then it might be a new issue. If it's during a print, then you could try using another USB cable or downgrading to 3.9.0 to see if the issue disappears (that is in case you can reliably generate the issue in 3.9.1-RC1).
Hi. The issue happened whilst printing. Layer 2 of a relatively small model.
I will check if I have any logs. I only ever saw this 112 once with 3.9.0. I will swap USB cables.
Log attached.
Looks like it may have detected a thermal issue, so may have been a genuine stop.
| Send: N3911 G1 X56.912 Y86.995 E0.02369*84
| Recv: Error: HOTEND THERMAL RUNAWAY
2020-09-02 21:55:32,158 - octoprint.util.comm - INFO - Changing monitoring state from "Printing" to "Error: HOTEND THERMAL RUNAWAY"
2020-09-02 21:55:32,168 - octoprint.util.comm - INFO - Force-sending M112 to the printer
2020-09-02 21:55:32,182 - octoprint.filemanager.analysis - INFO - Starting analysis of local:files-lager-22-2x_0.3mm_PLA_MK3S_3h28m.gcode
2020-09-02 21:55:32,238 - octoprint.filemanager.analysis - INFO - Invoking analysis command: /home/pi/oprint/bin/python2 -m octoprint analysis gcode --speed-x=6000 --speed-y=6000 --max-t=10 --throttle=0.0 --throttle-lines=100 /home/pi/.octoprint/uploads/files-lager-22-2x_0.3mm_PLA_MK3S_3h28m.gcode
2020-09-02 21:55:32,283 - octoprint.util.comm - INFO - Changing monitoring state from "Error: HOTEND THERMAL RUNAWAY" to "Offline (Error: HOTEND THERMAL RUNAWAY)"
2020-09-02 21:55:32,317 - octoprint.plugins.action_command_notification - INFO - Notifications cleared
2020-09-02 21:55:32,396 - octoprint.plugins.DisplayLayerProgress - INFO - Printing stopped. Detailed progress stopped.
2020-09-02 21:55:32,502 - octoprint.plugins.tracking - INFO - Sent tracking event commerror_firmware, payload: {'commerror_text': u'HOTEND THERMAL RUNAWAY'}
2020-09-02 21:55:32,676 - octoprint.plugins.tracking - INFO - Sent tracking event print_failed, payload: {'origin': u'local', u'reason': u'error', u'commerror_text': u'HOTEND THERMAL RUNAWAY', 'file': '6fdd47879c8f2ee309cda48a5063b8e0413157e7', u'elapsed': 1142}
@funkyspider Then it wasn't a communication issue in your case and you don't need to change the USB cable. Do you have a MK3S as well or is it a MK2.5S?
Btw, this isn't exactly the log I need. What I need is a dump of the Serial exchange between Octoprint and the printer.
It's called serial.log in these instructions: https://community.octoprint.org/t/where-can-i-find-octoprints-and-octopis-log-files/299
Hey I have an MK2.5S with same issue and have details on #2490 but can move to here since its newer ticket.
Heres my serial.log, I set the heatbed temp only, to 50c:
serial.log
From other ticket #2490
I just updated my MK2.5s to latest. (as a side note I've been running MK2.5 FIRMWARE because I havent fully upgraded my extruder but it has neve been an issue)
UPDATE:
So I checked the connector and the snegetive was fried.

Is there any chance this couldve been caused by firmware? Im asking because I dont know if I should just roll back to a firmware I know worked for me. Going to solder it back but dont want to have to take apart again.
Since its the negative im guessing its coincidance and normal wear and tear. Maybe I had it too tightly screwed and movements of hours upon hours of printing caused it to give.
That looks like mechanical strain on the conductors where they exit the printed clamp. As the individual conductors break the remaining have to handle more current which means they get warmer. Eventually when enough break they get very warm and cause that insulation damage.
When you redo the connections I'd guess that you will find similar though not as bad fatigue on the positive cable too. Those wires need cutting back and new crimps attaching for sure. Soldering is NOT recommended to reattach to connectors designed to be crimped onto wire.
@funkyspider is this issue still actual or can be closed? Thank you.
I have been unable to reproduce the issue to date. Please close and I will
re-raise if I can reproduce it reliably.
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, 09:00 JohnnyDeer, notifications@github.com wrote:
@funkyspider https://github.com/funkyspider is this issue still actual
or can be closed? Thank you.—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/prusa3d/Prusa-Firmware/issues/2822#issuecomment-736325292,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABZBDREQTVMNO44CNEUDI3SSSWC3ANCNFSM4QUM5YDQ
.
Most helpful comment
That looks like mechanical strain on the conductors where they exit the printed clamp. As the individual conductors break the remaining have to handle more current which means they get warmer. Eventually when enough break they get very warm and cause that insulation damage.
When you redo the connections I'd guess that you will find similar though not as bad fatigue on the positive cable too. Those wires need cutting back and new crimps attaching for sure. Soldering is NOT recommended to reattach to connectors designed to be crimped onto wire.