Bitbucket has deleted old Mercurial repos (and projects and issues):
We have a couple of now-dead links to the old PIL repo:
These need removing and the surrounding text rewritten/removed.
cc @aclark4life
For the CHANGES link to https://bitbucket.org/effbot/pil-2009-raclette/commits/all:
I had imported and archived the Hg repo to GitHub a while back. We could link to it:
https://github.com/hugovk/pil-2009-raclette/commits/master
Or even import from there and archive it in the https://github.com/python-pillow org?
@hugovk Wow RIP mercurial, yeah let's archive everything in effbot related to PIL I guess, let me know if you need any help.
Please could you do the import? I don't have permission.
Go to https://github.com/new/import
Clone url: https://github.com/hugovk/pil-2009-raclette
Owner: python-pillow
Name: pil-2009-raclette
Public
Then import
Then go to https://github.com/python-pillow/pil-2009-raclette/settings and archive this repo.
Thanks!
@hugovk Oh I see they're gone already from Bitbucket, yes I'll import shortly thanks.
Curiously this SVN repo is still up http://svn.effbot.org/public/pil/ ...
There is also an archive at https://bitbucket-archive.softwareheritage.org/projects/ef/effbot/pil-2009-raclette.html
Sweet! That's what I was looking for @nulano , thanks
Credit for finding it to @mattip: https://quodlibet.duckdns.org/irc/pypy/pypy_2020-08-19.log.html#t20:58:41
Interesting, one is not a subset of the other.
The newer Hg repo from https://bitbucket.org/effbot/pil-2009-raclette goes from March 2009 (1.1.6) to June 2011 (unreleased):
The older SVN repo from http://svn.effbot.org/public/pil/ goes from March 2006 (1.1.1) to November 2009 (1.1.7).
I feel like maybe we shouldn't be linking to the unreleased PIL changes. If Pillow was forked before that, then referencing it sounds like it just adds confusion.
So #4932 is my suggestion, just linking to http://svn.effbot.org/public/pil/
Between #4894 and #4932, the links are now removed.
Did we still want to import the repository?
Whatever you think is best, I don't have a strong opinion at this point (I thought I would at some point earlier …)
I'm fine either way too. At least I don't have access to do it, so it'd be someone else's task :)
Anyway, they're both archived under my account for future reference, I've no plans to move or change them:
OK, let's close this! Thanks!
Most helpful comment
Credit for finding it to
@mattip: https://quodlibet.duckdns.org/irc/pypy/pypy_2020-08-19.log.html#t20:58:41