Pillow: Multi-channel images get truncated to 3 channels

Created on 7 Jun 2018  路  3Comments  路  Source: python-pillow/Pillow

What did you do?

Several Deep Learning Framework Libraries (.e.g PyTorch's TorchVision), Image Processing libraries (.e.g skimage) and machine learning data augmentation libraries (e.g. Augmenter) internally rely on the PIL to perform image transformations.

You can have a situation where in a Semantic Segmentation problem, you have a 3-ch RGB input image, but have a 10-ch mask with each individual channels containing a binary mask of the classes found in the RGB image.

Another situation is when you deal with Geospatial Images, where a TIFF file can contain many channels (8-ch M-Band, 8-ch A-Band) of information corresponding to different spectral bands, for multispectral and hyper-spectral images.

If you use PIL to perform any type of transform, e.g. rescale, it truncates a multi-channel image to a 3-channel image.

There is a related issue #1888, related to PIL not being able to handle high-bit depth images.

What did you expect to happen?

I expected PIL to be able to handle multi-channel images.

What actually happened?

Any multi-channel image processed by the PIL library gets truncated to 3-channels.

What versions of Pillow and Python are you using?

Pillow-5.0.0
Python-3.6.4

The attached file is a binary mask containing 10-channels of binary information in the TIFF file format.

6100_2_2.tif.zip

This is how the original image looks like. It was originally in the TIFF file format, but I've converted it to JPEG format for display.

6100_2_2

Satellite Imagery (C) DigitalGlobe, Inc.

NumPy

Most helpful comment

One way to handle this is to process each channel individually, in parallel, if the number of channels is greater than 3.

I've had to stop using any image transforms that use PIL, in order to overcome this issue, and resort to using simple transformations using numpy at the moment.

All 3 comments

Thanks for the report, please see:

https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/issues/1888

One way to handle this is to process each channel individually, in parallel, if the number of channels is greater than 3.

I've had to stop using any image transforms that use PIL, in order to overcome this issue, and resort to using simple transformations using numpy at the moment.

See also #2821

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

Larivact picture Larivact  路  4Comments

anonymous530 picture anonymous530  路  3Comments

readyready15728 picture readyready15728  路  4Comments

indirectlylit picture indirectlylit  路  4Comments

naaaargle picture naaaargle  路  3Comments