X.Y.Z @ masterX.Y.Z [Descriptive Title]# 0.8.0 Virtual Sites and Bond Interpolation
[**For the complete release notes, please see our documentation**](https://open-forcefield-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/releasehistory.html#virtual-sites)
This release adds our largest feature yet, SMARTS-based creation of VirtualSites (also known as off-center charges), as well as functionality to handle bond parameter interpolation based on partial bond orders.
For help getting the OpenFF Toolkit running, see our [installation instructions](https://open-forcefield-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installation.html).
Please report bugs, request features, or ask questions through our [issue tracker](https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/issues).
**Please note that there may still be some changes to the API prior to a stable 1.0.0 release.**
Add the "See our install instructions" block verbatim from above
This is a pre-release, and click Release!This step is in flux. For now just build locally. With a few more hours of work we could get the automated package creation Action production-capable.
. build_local.sh
Upload directly to main label:
anaconda upload -u omnia /Users/jeffreywagner/miniconda3/envs/build/conda-bld/noarch/openforcefield-0.8.0-pyh39e3cac_0.tar.bz2
Test the package
masterCurrent Development header in releasehistory.rstAdd something like the following to the top of releasehistory.rst
0.9.0 - Current development
---------------------------
Per @SimonBoothroyd:
This way the first PR after a release isn't responsible for creating the new section and keeps things a bit more single purpose and less likely to create merge conflicts on the file.
mv ubuntu-latest_py3.7.sh.zip openforcefield-0.8.0-py37-Linux-x86_64.sh.zip
mv ubuntu-latest_py3.6.sh.zip openforcefield-0.8.0-py36-Linux-x86_64.sh.zip
mv macOS-latest_py3.6.sh.zip openforcefield-0.8.0-py36-MacOSX-x86_64.sh.zip
mv macOS-latest_py3.7.sh.zip openforcefield-0.8.0-py37-MacOSX-x86_64.sh.zip
Post something like this in #general
@channel We're pleased to announce the release of the Open Force Field Toolkit version 0.9.1! This is a minor release with small new features and small bugfixes. Detailed release notes are available at https://open-forcefield-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/0.9.1/releasehistory.html
Conda packages available now on the `conda-forge` channel!
https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/openff-toolkit/files
Single-file installers are available in the "assets" section of the GitHub release, at https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/releases/
We're pleased to announce the release of the Open Force Field Toolkit version 0.5! This release introduces support for GBSA, along with several bugfixes and other improvements. Detailed release notes are available at https://open-forcefield-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/0.5.0/releasehistory.html
Communication & Outreach / News on ConfluenceIt would be great to make this a Markdown checklist in openforcefield/devtools/
Also, the PI approval can likely be replaced by a sufficiently mature checklist. Perhaps we can skip that step with the idea that, once we've established the process, PI sign-offs is no longer needed? PI input should come at the level of helping shape release plans earlier through communicating which issues are critical or urgent.
That sounds good. I'm keeping this as an Issue for now, since it'll be easier to edit while we work out the process. But yes, we should transfer this into devtools once it's worked out.
And I'm planning on removing point 1) once we have a few more of these under our belt.
Some potential additions:
The RTD docs didn't auto-update when 0.3.0 was cut. We should add some steps to the build checklist to ensure this happens:
latestAlso, should we have a policy of back-porting the more detailed release notes on GitHub back into the sphinx docs release history?
Compare: https://open-forcefield-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/0.3.0/releasehistory.html
with: https://github.com/openforcefield/openforcefield/releases/tag/0.3.0
Per discussion on Slack, we should include the full-text names of functions whose behavior is changing, as well as functions being added or removed. This will be especially useful as we make a larger number of releases and users need to Ctrl-F to find a specific keyword.
Also, should we have a policy of back-porting the more detailed release notes on GitHub back into the sphinx docs release history?
@jchodera
I don't want to introduce more back-porting than is absolutely necessary, so maybe we could draft the summary text in releasenotes.rst above the bullet points? We could even do this in a "release cutting" PR to get these notes formally reviewed+approved. That would also give us a single clean PR to clean up any other irregularities.
I have a couple of suggestions, in increasing complexity:
Some more thoughts are available here Keep A Change Log.
@jaimergp Now that I've done this a few times, I definitely agree with the second point.
The first seems circular, but maybe I'm not understanding it correctly (The RTD can't have a link to the release page, since the RTD is a snapshot of what the docs were at the time of release, so by defnition the release hasn't happened yet when the RTD content is set)
@j-wags maybe append to this: Create a new placeholder section in the release history file for the next release. This way the first PR after a release isn't responsible for creating the new section and keeps things a bit more single purpose and less likely to create merge conflicts on the file!
Great call. Added as step 4.75!
Most helpful comment
I have a couple of suggestions, in increasing complexity:
Some more thoughts are available here Keep A Change Log.