Hello, I just wanted to inquire if we could, maybe, agree to always add a comma before the contributors' names in our changelogs? Otherwise we keep producing sometimes confusing, sometimes rather hilarious lines like the one in the title.
The latest changelog(s) have been rather inconsistent in that manner, although my impression is that more and more of those commas have made it through the review process.
So what I'm proposing is that instead of:
If comment is empty, a 1-based index is assigned by Richard Höchenberger
we'd add an entry
If comment is empty, a 1-based index is assigned, by Richard Höchenberger
WDYT?
cc @cbrnr @agramfort @sappelhoff @larsoner @drammock
+1 for ,
>
+1 for ,
agreed
I'm happy with that, or switch to (by whoever, :gh:whatever)
I am also pro-comma, and have recently been asked (though I forget by who) to remove them in my PRs for the sake of consistency with other people's entries. So I would like this policy change to be documented somewhere.
and have recently been asked (though I forget by who) to remove them in my PRs for the sake of consistency with other people's entries.
Might have been me 😁
I'm 👍 for (by whoever, :gh:whatever) - it is easier to see the contributor when there are parens.
I'm 👍 for
(by whoever, :gh:whatever)- it is easier to see the contributor when there are parens.
I like this proposal too, but would prefer it without the by. I'm +1 for , and +1.75 for (My Name, #foo) or even
(My Name, Another Name: #foo, #bar)
Works for me
me too. But again, please document the new standard in our contributing docs. Since the latest.inc gets reset every release, it's too easy for the first couple of PRs to do it their own way and set a precedent for the remainder of the release cycle.
Yes, I like it!
So... Which one now? Comma? Or the parentheses? I'm confused, and it's my own fault haha
let's go with
(`Contributor Name`_, `Second Contributor`_ and `Third Contributor`_, :gh:`0000`)
Yes, but let's use an Oxford comma please.
Most helpful comment
let's go with