I get some wrong and some strange imformation when importing citation information in citavi. This applies also to other graduate panel cohorts.
As example from the citation guideline gra2013:

What I get when importing information in Citavi via DOI:

In my opinion the following information is wrong/missing/strange:
And related to this: In my opinion the methods reports for example should have their own DOIs for more convenient citation-especially as those have different authors. --> #2798
Again we have the problem with the wrong name of the FDZ, which is also discussed here: https://github.com/dzhw/FDZ_Allgemein/issues/565
We will replace "FDZ des DZHW" with "FDZ-DZHW" and try to offer a BibTex export wich can be imported by Citavi. The Metadataimport via DOI is powered by DataCite and cannot be improved...
we need to list these attributes this way to be harvested by our cooperation partner VerbundFDB


datacite and and citavi don't seem to handle the information appropriately ...
BibTex has some limitations which prevent a perfect Citavi import:
@misceditor instead@misc does not support field institution but we provide it anyway@misc does not support field address but we provide it anywaytitle (no subtitle or similar), thus we concatenate title, survey period, accessway and version.We cannot generate BibTex on IE11 :(



This is working (taking into account the limitations mentioned here https://github.com/dzhw/metadatamanagement/issues/2797#issuecomment-820378544)
Most helpful comment
We cannot generate BibTex on IE11 :(