I sent the following link to @annegaertner : https://metadata.fdz.dzhw.eu/#!/de/studies/stu-gra2005$?version=1.0.0 (shadow copy)

But the link leads @annegaertner to this page:

Is this correct?
@annegaertner was logged in when she opened the link. That's why she cannot see the shadow copy. We have not yet implemented viewing shadow copies as authenticated user...
@rreitmann I think I remember this was even topic at one of the latest reviews.. Sorry, I forgot and thanks for your quick help!
@annegaertner No problem, I'll keep this issue open and we will discuss if we implement that feature or if we just improve the message for authenticated users...
If I enter an invalid version number (in this case 2.3.1) in the url it does not show that this version is invalid - it just states
Your link refers to a former version (2.3.1) of this study. This page displays the current version (3.0.0) of the study[...]
I'm unsure whether this should be a new issue.
The rest works as expected. I leave it open but assign @rreitmann until we can discuss whether this is worth a new issue.
Moved to new issue #2357.
Most helpful comment
@annegaertner was logged in when she opened the link. That's why she cannot see the shadow copy. We have not yet implemented viewing shadow copies as authenticated user...