The v1 documentation here states that, "The CSS injected by Material-UI to style a component has the lowest specificity possible as the is injected at the top of the
I'm trying to follow the JSS docs to customize the insertion point via a comment, but everything I do within jss.setup()
seems to be overriden with a MUIThemProvider that usesmuiThemeProviderFactory.js
, which I don't have direct access to.
The docs examples use getContext
, but that seems like a lot of extra boilerplate just to set a CSS insertion point. Does anyone have any advice on how I can get the JSS styles to actually render at the bottom of the <head />
element?
I'm reporting this here instead of SO, because I believe that the documentation is incorrect, and could use some examples for what I would expect to be a common use case for MUI consumers that don't also rely on JSS as their primary styling solution.
Update: I'm able to get it working using react-jss
:
const jss = create(preset());
jss.options.insertionPoint = 'insertion-point-jss';
<JssProvider jss={jss}>
<MuiThemeProvider theme={theme}>{this.props.children}</MuiThemeProvider>
</JssProvider>
However, I now get console warnings such as:
warning.js?6327:36 Warning: Failed context type: Invalid context `64a55d578f856d258dc345b094a2a2b3` of type `Jss` supplied to `withStyles(FormControl)`, expected instance of `Jss`.
I believe it's because I use Lerna, which is hoisting the jss I've manually installed, but not the one installed by material-ui, since I am using 2 versions (0.19.0 and 1.0beta) for legacy purposes.
I should also note that this introduces a lot of cruft in the way of dependencies and boilerplace. It would be great if we could just declare the insertion point as an argument to MuiThemeProvider
.
The CSS injected by Material-UI to style a component has the lowest specificity possible as the is injected at the top of the
I have observed the opposite default behavior. So that sentence might be 100% wrong. I was expecting the opposite at the time I wrote it.
However, I am observing locally that the styles are being injected at the bottom of the head.
@kof Any reason for this default behavior? If it's not an issue on JSS side, then we are going to have to update the documentation to match the reality.
I'm trying to follow the JSS docs to customize the insertion point via a comment
Our documentation is doing so to handle an external algolia style specificity issue.
I think its a good idea to allow all jss options passed down from mui.
If no insertion point found, JSS will inject at the bottom, as we assume that JSS is used for user styles and some other styles like css normalize/reset should be applied before.
If no insertion point found, JSS will inject at the bottom, as we assume that JSS is used for user styles and some other styles like css normalize/reset should be applied before.
This argument is convincing 馃憤, we need to update the documentation.
I believe it's because I use Lerna, which is hoisting the jss I've manually installed
Yes, this warning makes me think you have a duplicated JSS module. Aside from the warning. Does it work?
It would be great if we could just declare the insertion point as an argument to MuiThemeProvider.
I'm not sure it's something that would be wise to do. Hopefully, we want to merge react-jss and material-ui styling solution. MuiThemeProvider
responsibility is the theme, not the styling implementation. It's the JssProvider
how has this responsibility. I would rather say that we could make so JssProvider
accepts an insertionPoint
property. But it's out of the scope of this project.
Yes, this warning makes me think you have a duplicated JSS module. Aside from the warning. Does it work?
Yep it does work.
I would rather say that we could make so JssProvider accepts an insertionPoint property.
I don't have a problem with that, but I will say that it doesn't seem ideal to require including another dependency explicitly just to change a flag.
Yeah, we break the encapsulation as soon as users need to customize the default behavior, not great. I would encourage you to open an issue on the react-jss side with your use case. There isn't much anything special with Material-UI, I think that all react-jss users are affected by this issue.
So given that the styles generated by JSS are injected at the end of the header, how do we configure JSS with a different insertion point?
The docs say:
If you are experiencing a CSS injection order issue, take a look at the mechanism JSS provides on how to handle this situation. By adjusting the placement of the insertionPoint comment within your HTML body you can control the order that the CSS rules are applied to your components.
But it doesn't look like you expose the instance of JSS you're using so there is no viable way to specify the insertion point when using Material UI.
@Undistraction I've unfortunately resorted to reconfiguring my other styling solution to insert below JSS, instead of trying to reconfigure JSS itself. The only way I found it possible to reconfigure the JSS insertion point was to manually import jss-react and reconfigure everything that already happens behind the scenes with MUI. It ended up being much easier to configure react-css-modules than keep fiddling with JSS.
Here is an example of how the documentation is handling it:
@rsolomon Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately I have CSS Module styles that are being compiled by Webpack - they are in place before the application is initialised and JSS does its thing. So I need to be able to place the insertion point before the CSS generated by Webpack.
@oliviertassinari Thanks for the links.
I also compile CSS modules using extract css plugin. It creates a file that you should have complete control over where it's imported.
@rsolomon But if even if I place the CSS Modules import at the end of the head, JSS will run at runtime, long after the html page has already been generated, and will place its styles afterwards ... or am I missing something?
Top of <body />
:)
@rsolomon Well that's something I didn't know was allowed, but looks like it was made valid in HTML5.
It's not ideal, but I found it to be a much more concise solution than recreating the entire JSS config and importing the JSS-react dependencies.
Yep. I imagine it will be a pretty common request, so a simple way to do it that is part of Material UI makes sense to me.
Alright, I'm OK to diverge again from the react-jss projet. Maybe we could add a jssOptions property to the MuiThemeProvider.
So any update on this?
When I wrap MuiThemeProvider
like this to set the insertionPoint:
<JssProvider jss={jss}>
<MuiThemeProvider theme={theme} sheetsManager={new Map()}>
...
</MuiThemeProvider>
</JssProvider>
On the client it'll generate wrong class name: root-0-7
for MuiPaper-root-8
(on Server)
And when set:
jss.options.createGenerateClassName = createGenerateClassName
It generated the correct classname like the server, but it has this warning:
Warning: Material-UI: You can only instantiate one class name generator on the client side.
If you do otherwise, you take the risk to have conflicting class names in production.
@trungtin Are you able to figure out why multiple class name generators are created?
I'm not familiar with JSS so have no idea where to start. Do you have any suggestion?
There is another problem when wrapping JssProvider on the client side:
I'm using universal-router
, so when going from one route without MuiButton to another having MuiButton, the injected style seems to collide with existing styles:
<style type="text/css" data-jss="" data-meta="MuiAppBar">
.root-0-0 {
...
}
...
</style>
then this one is injected to the header
<style type="text/css" data-jss="" data-meta="MuiButton">
.root-0-0 {
...
}
...
</style>
Notice the same className
But if go directly to the route with MuiButton. Then the className will be generated differently, and thing work well
Right now JssProvider has to be on a very top and not be rerendered. This will be fixed in the next react-jss version.
Apologies if this is disinfo, but a few days ago I was getting this error installing the create react app example in the @next branch for the first time. All the dependencies were pinned at "latest". It seemed uninstalling the jss dependencies (pinned at latest) and then reinstalling only the jss-react and jss-preset-default seemed to work. My hunch was that the "latest" versions got out of sync and thus were generating the hash differently.
Currently, my pins are: "react-jss": "^7.2.0", "jss-preset-default": "^4.0.1"
Currently latest of react-jss has pins:
"jss": "^8.1.0",
"jss-preset-default": "^3.0.0",
The latest jss is version 9.0.0. My node fu isn't super strong, but if my understanding is correct when jss is manually pinned at 'latest' (9.0.0) and react-jss at "latest" (7.2.0) the later is expecting the 8.0.x release of jss.
@blainegarrett Please follow #8717.
Guys any update on how insertionPoint
may be configured? Latest suggestion
<JssProvider jss={jss}>
<MuiThemeProvider theme={theme} sheetsManager={new Map()}>
...
</MuiThemeProvider>
</JssProvider>
is not working for me for some reason.
I'm trying to change the insertion point for material-ui/core v1.5.1. Nothing I've tried has worked.
I'd really like to get rid of this JSS garbage in my react-admin project. The whole mess of code surrounding the management of JSS just stinks so badly. The team that makes JSS also puts their trashy advertisements in the packages postinstall hooks. They obviously don't respect developers and I want nothing to do with their tech.
Has anyone figured this out for v1.5.1?
@kof Seriously...imagine if every package did that? (Here's another FU buddy - seeya around ;)
I'm trying to change the insertion point for material-ui/core v1.5.1. Nothing I've tried has worked.
@waynebloss I'm working on improving the API for v4. It's a common use case, it should be trivial to do. You can find examples in https://material-ui.com/guides/interoperability/.
The team that makes JSS also puts their trashy advertisements in the packages postinstall hooks
I have already raised this concern to @kof. The post install was removed in JSS v10, the version Material-UI v4-alpha depends on.
Seriously...imagine if every package did that?
@waynebloss Imagine if every package user was contributing more?
@oliviertassinari Trashy advertising is self evident. You're looking at exactly one of my accounts.
Perhaps you should try knowing more before pointing fingers.
Gee, I do have 66 repos on this account tho. Does that not count as contributing?
I'm guessing you also think reporting bugs isn't contributing too lol.
Hey everybody!! Stop reporting bugs to MUI, they don't need you. kthxbai!!
Perhaps you should try knowing more before pointing fingers.
@waynebloss Perhaps you should try a different approach when communicating with people who dedicate a large portion of their lives to something you benefit from without the expectation of payment.
Most helpful comment
@waynebloss Perhaps you should try a different approach when communicating with people who dedicate a large portion of their lives to something you benefit from without the expectation of payment.