Mastodon: Moderation support tools: "most blocked" lists

Created on 13 Nov 2017  路  5Comments  路  Source: tootsuite/mastodon

To make proactive moderation easier, might it be worth having an admin-/moderator-visible list of accounts/instances that have been blocked or muted by multiple local users (with a configurable threshold, to accommodate differing instance sizes)?

This would allow mods and admins to spot recurring misbehaviour from specific users or instances so they can proactively investigate if moderator-level action or community discussion might be appropriate before an issue becomes serious enough for users to draw their attention to it.


  • [x] I searched or browsed the repo鈥檚 other issues to ensure this is not a duplicate.
  • [x] This bug happens on a tagged release and not on master (If you're a user, don't worry about this).
admin support suggestion

Most helpful comment

It might be useful if the feature also showed how many people on the local instance follow each most-blocked-person/instance too?

All 5 comments

The potential for abuse for such a feature seems relatively low to me (though I'm wondering if this might be abusable by malicious admins to guide harassment?). Input from others on whether this is a terrible idea would be much appreciated.

Oooh, yeah, this seems like a good idea

馃憤

It might be useful if the feature also showed how many people on the local instance follow each most-blocked-person/instance too?

the block and report buttons have very distinct, separate purposes, and blurring the line between them would be a betrayal of user trust. blocking as a separate operation from reporting is implicitly a private action, as such it's inappropriate for a moderator to that data, either individually or in aggregate.

if blocking a user increases the chances of them being subject to scrutiny by a moderator, then blocking becomes a punitive action. this undermines one of blocking's core functions: a forceful, last-ditch tool for de-escalating conflict. i've blocked people i care about who i absolutely don't want to harm*. and there's plenty of other non-reportable reasons to block a user. maybe you just don't like someone's posts, maybe somebody vents about issues in their life that happen to be a trigger for you (in which case, the last thing you want to do is risk jeopardizing their access to community!), maybe you're in the midst of a wave of harassment and you're blocking anyone who sends you a follow request, maybe you're just a really private person and you block anyone who interacts with you other than close friends. the reasons abound. making the block button punitive directly hurts its usability.

if a user blocks someone without reporting, that was their choice. if you believe users are not reporting reportable content, that's a UI, policy, or user trust issue, and has to be addressed at the root, rather than substituting report data for some heuristic based on private user data that wasn't meant for that purpose.

*one may argue that increased moderator scrutiny isn't harm, since they still have final say over who gets banned. But mods are humans, and we can't deny that pre-biasing their view of someone as a "problem user" will have some effect on their treatment of that person in future mod interventions.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

thomaskuntzz picture thomaskuntzz  路  3Comments

golbette picture golbette  路  3Comments

cwebber picture cwebber  路  3Comments

Lewiscowles1986 picture Lewiscowles1986  路  3Comments

svetlik picture svetlik  路  3Comments