Magento2: Check box alignment issue at Statistics

Created on 6 Nov 2019  路  19Comments  路  Source: magento/magento2

Check box alignment issue at Statistics

Preconditions (*)

Magento : 2.3.3

Steps to reproduce (*)

Admin -> Reports -> Statistics -> Refresh Statistics

Expected result (*)

Check box alignment should proper

Actual result (*)

image

Backend Reports Clear Description Confirmed Format is valid Ready for Work Reproduced on 2.3.x

Most helpful comment

Let me close this as it's a duplicate of https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues/25429
To summarize: the problem only occurs in Magento 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 when using Google Chrome version 78

A fix is already in the works in https://github.com/magento/magento2/pull/25443

All 19 comments

Hi @renard123. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

  • [ ] Summary of the issue
  • [ ] Information on your environment
  • [ ] Steps to reproduce
  • [ ] Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento give me 2.3-develop instance - upcoming 2.3.x release

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

@renard123 do you confirm that you were able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?

  • [ ] yes
  • [ ] no

Hi @krishprakash. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:

  • [x] 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).
    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.
  • [x] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • [x] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • [x] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!

  • [x] 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • [x] 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@magento give me 2.3-develop instance

Hi @krishprakash. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.3-develop instance for you

Hi @krishprakash, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-25491-2-3-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.

:white_check_mark: Confirmed by @krishprakash
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-22861 were created

Issue Available: @krishprakash, _You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself._

Hi @drpayyne. Thank you for working on this issue.
Looks like this issue is already verified and confirmed. But if you want to validate it one more time, please, go though the following instruction:

  • [ ] 1. Add/Edit Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
  • [ ] 2. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!

  • [ ] 3. If the issue is not relevant or is not reproducible any more, feel free to close it.


Hi @renard123 @krishprakash, I'm unable to reproduce it in my local with updated 2.3-develop branch. Were you able to reproduce this on 2.3-develop branch, @krishprakash?
image

Hi @drpayyne. Thanks for your feedback
I have checked at my local instance and also verify on latest magento instance as provided here https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues/25491#issuecomment-550280077

Local instance screenshot:
image

Thanks, @krishprakash. Let me test it here and check.

@magento give me 2.3-develop instance

Hi @drpayyne. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.3-develop instance for you

Hi @drpayyne, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-25491-2-3-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.

@krishprakash, what browser, may I ask? :thinking:

Yes, Chrome Version 78.0.3904.87 (Official Build) (64-bit)

Not reproducible on Firefox Developer Edition 71.0b6 (64-bit). Checking on Chromium.

Not reproducible on Chromium Version 77.0.3865.90 (Official Build) Built on Ubuntu , running on Ubuntu 18.04 (64-bit), either. Will check on Chrome.

This issue is reproducible in latest Google Chrome version, I use 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 and all my magento sites presents this issue in cache module as well

Let me close this as it's a duplicate of https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues/25429
To summarize: the problem only occurs in Magento 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 when using Google Chrome version 78

A fix is already in the works in https://github.com/magento/magento2/pull/25443

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings