cataloginventory/item_options/min_sale_qty, the default value is 1.cataloginventory/item_options/min_sale_qty gets an array as a value.Update Attributes in the Actions dropdown menu.system.log reports the following issue:main.CRITICAL: Warning: A non-numeric value encountered in vendor/magento/module-catalog/view/adminhtml/templates/catalog/product/edit/action/inventory.phtml on line 135
This is because cataloginventory/item_options/min_sale_qty is no longer a numeric value.

Hi @samgranger. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:
Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:
@magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance - upcoming 2.3.x release
For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.
@samgranger do you confirm that you was able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?
@magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance
Hi @hiren0241. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.3-develop instance for you
Hi @hiren0241, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-21640-2-3-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.
Hi @samgranger, By following steps to reproduce, I am unable to reproduce it.
@hiren0241 I noticed the setting wasn't changed, see screenshot. I have changed this for you. Please try the Update Attributes functionality again.



@samgranger Okay, got your point. Let me try once again.
@samgranger Reproduced. Thanks for correction.
Hi @hiren0241. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.[x] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.
[x] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[x] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[x] 5. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch. Details
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x
_Next steps are available in case you are a member of Community Maintainers._
[ ] 6. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
[ ] 7. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
:white_check_mark: Confirmed by @hiren0241
Thank you for verifying the issue! :+1: Your confirmation will help us to acknowledge and process this report.
@magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance
Hi @hiren0241. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.2-develop instance for you
Hi @hiren0241, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-21640-2-2-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.
Hi @hiren0241. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.[x] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.
[x] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[x] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[x] 5. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch. Details
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x
_Next steps are available in case you are a member of Community Maintainers._
[ ] 6. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
[ ] 7. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
@samgranger
Issue confirmed: https://prnt.sc/mv00le
Presently, I am working on this issue.
Hi @shikhamis11. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.[ ] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.
[ ] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[ ] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[ ] 5. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch. Details
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x
_Next steps are available in case you are a member of Community Maintainers._
[ ] 6. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
[ ] 7. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
Great, thank you @hiren0241
:white_check_mark: Confirmed by @shikhamis11
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MAGETWO-98627, MAGETWO-98628 were created
Issue Available: @shikhamis11, _You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself._
@samgranger While getting configuration from database , this value: '{"32000":456,"0":123}' creates an error. we need to unserialize the config value.
I case of default value, nothing is happen. But, while we not using default system config it gives an error.
@hiren0241 Indeed, I believe this use to be a fixed integer value configuration but now it can vary per user group. You'd expect the default value would also be an object now instead of just being 1.
@samgranger I have fixed issue by getting exact configuration value set by back-end configuration. Now, whatever sets in back-end same will reflect in frontend as well.
Hi @samgranger,
thank you for your report!
This bug has been already reported in #17592.
So I'm closing the current issue in order to avoid duplicates.
Thank you!