Pull that customer using REST Api.
updated_at time should change.
updated_at time not changing.
@arijit-insync what do you expect to see the updatedAt time reflect? The time the address was changed in the front end, or the time the API call is made? Are you using GET /V1/customers/{customerId}?
The time the address was changed in the frontend. Yes, I am using your API call
Address is stored separately from the customer record, so a change to the address only will not modify updatedAt for the customer record. To do this we would have to modify the API to update the customer record in the database when the address is changed. Please confirm this is your intention. If so, I will record this as a feature request for APIs.
Thanks for understanding the issue. I personally feel it is not a concern of a consumer on how data is stored in backend. An API should be full proof to handle any customer scenario for a website.
Lets take a scenario
[Provided : You are sending address data with the customer]
I don't see this as a feature, if customer does not contain address related information, then it would have been, but in our case the API is sending some wrong data and there is no alternative way to search through address field.
If you think this as a feature, can you please provide me an alternative solution to this ?
My intention is to get all customer data that has been updated in server after a particular time.
Thanks
@mbrinton01 I agree with @arijit-insync . I too didn't find a way to pull customers address which updated after a particular time nor I think we can run joins in API searches. There needs a way to pull that customer any particular updated happen on them.
Addresses records are linked to particular customer record and there are not part of any other records. Hence, I think any update happening on them should be reflected on customer record Hence, updatedAt field value needs to be updated with any update any customer address field or customer fields.
@misha-kotov please capture this request in MAGETWO
@arijit-insync, thank you for your report.
We've created internal ticket(s) MAGETWO-82433 to track progress on the issue.
Hi Team,
What is the status of this issue?
+1 Any update? We are also encountering this issue, which impacts accurate syncs and integrations. Very important to resolve. In summary, upon edit of existing address, associated customer should be "touched" (last_updated updated on customer). Also, is there a workaround? We are using REST API for all interactions, as described above. Thanks!
I am working on this at #dmcdindia
@arijit-de thank you for joining. Please accept team invitation here and self-assign the issue.
Any update on this issue?
I would be willing to take on this issue! #SQUASHTOBERFEST
@manishmittalm thank you for joining. Please accept team invitation here and self-assign the issue.
Hi @manishmittalm. Thank you for working on this issue.
Looks like this issue is already verified and confirmed. But if your want to validate it one more time, please, go though the following instruction:
Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.[ ] 2. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[ ] 3. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch. Details
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x
[ ] 4. If the issue is not relevant or is not reproducible any more, feel free to close it.
@dmitrijivanenko thank you for joining. Please accept team invitation here and self-assign the issue.
Hi @dmitrijivanenko. Thank you for working on this issue.
Looks like this issue is already verified and confirmed. But if your want to validate it one more time, please, go though the following instruction:
Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.[x] 2. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[x] 3. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch. Details
- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x
[ ] 4. If the issue is not relevant or is not reproducible any more, feel free to close it.
Hi @manishmittalm. Thank you for working on this issue.
Looks like this issue is already verified and confirmed. But if you want to validate it one more time, please, go though the following instruction:
Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.[ ] 2. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[ ] 3. If the issue is not relevant or is not reproducible any more, feel free to close it.
Most helpful comment
+1 Any update? We are also encountering this issue, which impacts accurate syncs and integrations. Very important to resolve. In summary, upon edit of existing
address, associatedcustomershould be "touched" (last_updatedupdated oncustomer). Also, is there a workaround? We are using REST API for all interactions, as described above. Thanks!