Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: A Repository to Simulate the Spread of COVID-19 in any Population with a Known Age-Structure, Made in Tübingen.
Submitting author: @vahid-sb (Vahid S. Bokharaie)
Repository: https://github.com/vahid-sb/MiTepid_sim
Version: v0.0.5
Editor: @majensen
Reviewers: @AngryMaciek
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vahid-sb. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@vahid-sb if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
whedon
All 17 comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.07 s (275.8 files/s, 41828.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 14 364 743 1471
Markdown 1 21 0 37
reStructuredText 1 26 5 36
TeX 1 4 0 22
YAML 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 18 415 748 1567
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '0893a9d0c62b9e199f3b9639' was
gathered on 2020/10/27.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Vahid Bokharaie 13 3712 1134 100.00
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Vahid Bokharaie 2578 69.5 0.1 8.26
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1101/2020.10.16.20213835 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.04.10.20060681 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
whedon
on 27 Oct 2020
@whedon invite @majensen as editor
:wave: @majensen - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?
arfon
on 31 Oct 2020
@majensen has been invited to edit this submission.
whedon
on 31 Oct 2020
@whedon assign me as editor
majensen
on 31 Oct 2020
OK, the editor is @majensen
whedon
on 31 Oct 2020
⚡️ thanks @majensen
arfon
on 31 Oct 2020
@oeco28 - how's it going in the Palouse? Could I interest you in reviewing this software for the Journal of Open Source Software? Please have a look at the review process and let me know in this thread. Or, if you have a colleague you could recommend, that would be wonderful. --@majensen
majensen
on 4 Nov 2020
Dude!!
All good! Staying safe. How are you? Long time no see! Let me see. Do you
mind if I take a look at the review process. when do you need it? I have
three kids under 6 at home and everything takes a bit longer than usual!
big hugs
Omar
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:17 PM Mark Jensen notifications@github.com
wrote:
- how's it going in the Palouse? Could I interest you in reviewing this
software <#m_-132020001114090690_2790> for the Journal of Open Source
Software
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://joss.theoj.org__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!6WdPAO-tHp8EW-zPly15ipUIQxdWuWAaA1vzkJ3R57QK1TIGBwSUcsFFyTnwbt4RBUA$?
Please have a look at the review process
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!6WdPAO-tHp8EW-zPly15ipUIQxdWuWAaA1vzkJ3R57QK1TIGBwSUcsFFyTnwNN0zD1A$
and let me know in this thread. Or, if you have a colleague you could
recommend, that would be wonderful. --@majensen
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/majensen__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!6WdPAO-tHp8EW-zPly15ipUIQxdWuWAaA1vzkJ3R57QK1TIGBwSUcsFFyTnwrnCBMng$—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2790*issuecomment-721952713__;Iw!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!6WdPAO-tHp8EW-zPly15ipUIQxdWuWAaA1vzkJ3R57QK1TIGBwSUcsFFyTnwuBrpj74$,
or unsubscribe
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNNQ2YB5BV4KOOVRLWJPLTSOGZG3ANCNFSM4TBNSI5Q__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!6WdPAO-tHp8EW-zPly15ipUIQxdWuWAaA1vzkJ3R57QK1TIGBwSUcsFFyTnwoiQ5ZI8$
.
--
Omar E. Cornejo, PhD
Associate Professor,
School of Biological Sciences
Washington State University
Heald 429. PO Box 644236
Pullman, WA. 99164-4236
oeco28
on 6 Nov 2020
@oeco28 - 3 kids ??? You HAVE been busy, my friend! Take your time-
majensen
on 7 Nov 2020
@AngryMaciek -- would you have time and inclination to review this work for JOSS? Please let me know - appreciated!
majensen
on 9 Nov 2020
@majensen : sure, I'd be very glad to experience the process from the other side.
I have just added myself to the reviewers list for JOSS, it's official :)
AngryMaciek
on 9 Nov 2020
@whedon assign @AngryMaciek as reviewer
majensen
on 9 Nov 2020
OK, @AngryMaciek is now a reviewer
whedon
on 9 Nov 2020
@oeco28 -- what do you think, do you have time to review?
majensen
on 16 Nov 2020
Related issues
whedon
·
12Comments
whedon
·
8Comments
whedon
·
11Comments
whedon
·
8Comments
whedon
·
12Comments