Submitting author: @assignUser (Jacob Wujciak-Jens)
Repository: https://github.com/kgoldfeld/simstudy/
Version: v0.2.1
Editor: @mikldk
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @assignUser. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@assignUser if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.12 s (533.5 files/s, 99010.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 33 1123 2970 4263
Rmd 11 570 550 1016
YAML 10 86 3 488
Markdown 7 121 0 357
C++ 2 36 8 101
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 63 1936 3531 6225
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '154f9557d81823d24e0f4982' was
gathered on 2020/10/18.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
James Joseph Balamut 2 10 26 4.24
Keith Goldfeld 24 487 326 95.76
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
James Joseph Balamut 9 90.0 27.5 0.00
Keith Goldfeld 136 27.9 2.8 5.88
PDF failed to compile for issue #2760 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-submission
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-submission. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@whedon check references from branch joss-submission
Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss-submission
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.18637/jss.v037.i03 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.02.001 is OK
- 10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p248 is OK
- 10.1007/s40273-020-00946-y is OK
- 10.1080/00031305.1991.10475828 is OK
- 10.1111/dmcn.14552 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v069.i04 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/59uaq is OK
- 10.1002/sim.8452 is OK
- 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001063 is OK
- 10.1080/03610918.2012.718841 is OK
- 10.1101/215889 is OK
- 10.1007/s10463-020-00761-4 is OK
- 10.1186/s13063-019-3364-x is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
馃憢 @mikldk - would you be willing to edit this submission?
@whedon invite @mikldk as editor
@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon assign me as editor
OK, the editor is @mikldk
Thank you for considering our submission and the quick start of the process!
Potential reviewers from the provided list with no active reviews, R/C++ and relevant topics, sorted bottom to top:
j-andrews7
gagolews
brunaw
tbrown122387
pedro-teles-fonseca
@brunaw, @gagolews: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
@mikldk I'm willing to write a review.
@mikldk Yes, I would be happy to
@whedon add @gagolews as reviewer
OK, @gagolews is now a reviewer
@whedon add @brunaw as reviewer
OK, @brunaw is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2763.