Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: PyMatting: A Python Library for Alpha Matting

Created on 2 Jul 2020  Â·  35Comments  Â·  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @99991 (Thomas Germer)
Repository: https://github.com/pymatting/pymatting
Version: v1.0.6
Editor: @gkthiruvathukal
Reviewers: @ziatdinovmax, @macrocosme
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @99991. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@99991 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
C++ Python Shell pre-review

Most helpful comment

All 35 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.14 s (649.0 files/s, 52622.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          67           1329           1395           3091
TeX                              1             22              0            202
Markdown                         6             67              0            202
C                                2             72            114            141
C++                              2             47             12            129
reStructuredText                 6             98            122            117
Bourne Shell                     2              9              0             39
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
YAML                             1              1              0             26
make                             1              4              7              9
HTML                             1              0              0              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            90           1657           1651           3989
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2423' was gathered on 2020/07/02.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
99991                           14          6511            500           81.96
Joseph Adams                     1             2              2            0.05
Tobias Uelwer                    9           100            137            2.77
germer                           2           372            366            8.63
uelwer                          12           457            107            6.59

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
99991                      5540           85.1          0.3                7.47
Tobias Uelwer               520          520.0          3.3                1.73
germer                      270           72.6          0.0               11.11

PDF failed to compile for issue #2423 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-submission

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-submission. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon check references from branch joss-submission

Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss-submission
Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.18 is OK
- 10.1016/j.parco.2011.09.001 is OK
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1177 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459326 is OK
- 10.1145/992200.992206 is OK
- 10.1134/S1995080219050056 is OK
- 10.1137/S0895479899358194 is OK
- 10.1534/genetics.115.179887 is OK
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2789187 is OK
- 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539896 is OK
- 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206503 is OK
- 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995665 is OK
- 10.1145/200979.200981 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.2172/751785 may be missing for title: SuperLU users’ guide
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2005.07.004 may be missing for title: Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.08.013 may be missing for title: Enhancing the scalability of selected inversion factorization algorithms in genomic prediction
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(78)90098-0 may be missing for title: The incomplete Cholesky—conjugate gradient method for the iterative solution of systems of linear equations
- https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351069397-24 may be missing for title: Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems

INVALID DOIs

- None

@99991 - please take a look at the references above - if correct, please add them to your .bib file then use the same commands to whedon that I did to regenerate the paper and check the references

👋 @gkthiruvathukal - would you be willing to edit this submission?

@whedon invite @gkthiruvathukal as editor

@gkthiruvathukal has been invited to edit this submission.

@danielskatz Yes, I'm willing to edit it!

@whedon assign @gkthiruvathukal as editor

OK, the editor is @gkthiruvathukal

@whedon check references from branch joss-submission

Attempting to check references... from custom branch joss-submission
Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.18 is OK
- 10.1016/j.parco.2011.09.001 is OK
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1177 is OK
- 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459326 is OK
- 10.2172/751785 is OK
- 10.1145/992200.992206 is OK
- 10.1134/S1995080219050056 is OK
- 10.1137/S0895479899358194 is OK
- 10.1016/j.parco.2005.07.004 is OK
- 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539896 is OK
- 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206503 is OK
- 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90098-0 is OK
- 10.1201/9781351069397-24 is OK
- 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995665 is OK
- 10.1145/200979.200981 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-submission

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-submission. Reticulating splines etc...

We would like to suggest the potential reviewers faroit, ziatdinovmax and macrocosme.

@99991 Thanks for these suggestions. I will try to get review started over the weekend!

@faroit and @ziatdinovmax, I am in need of two reviewers for this JOSS submission. Would either or both of you be willing to contribute a review for this JOSS submission?

@gkthiruvathukal I could do that but computer vision is not my level of expertise. If you still can't find a suitable reviewer from a close field, just ping me

@gkthiruvathukal Yes, I will be happy to help with a review.

@whedon assign @ziatdinovmax as reviewer

OK, @ziatdinovmax is now a reviewer

@macrocosme Would you be willing to contribute a review for this JOSS submission? I need a second, since this is outside @faroit's expertise.

@faroit Even when not entirely your expertise, the goal is to know whether the software meets the JOSS criteria and can perform its mission successfully. I hope you'd be willing to be the second reviewer, if @macrocosme is not available.

@gkthiruvathukal I will be happy to contribute a review for this JOSS submission.

@whedon add @macrocosme as reviewer

OK, @macrocosme is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2481.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings