Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: WordTokenizers.jl: Basic tools for tokenizing natural language in Julia

Created on 8 Dec 2019  路  30Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @oxinabox (Lyndon White)
Repository: https://github.com/JuliaText/WordTokenizers.jl/
Version: v0.5.3
Editor: @will-rowe
Reviewers: @leios, @ninjin

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @oxinabox. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@oxinabox if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
Julia TeX pre-review

Most helpful comment

I can do it, as long as I get two weeks to do so. That way I can clear the pre-Christmas hell first.

All 30 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

Attempting to check references...
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

```Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

  • None

MISSING DOIs

INVALID DOIs

  • None
    ```

馃憢 @oxinabox - thanks for your submission!

As you can see above, @whedon thinks some of your bib entries might be missing DOIs (but @whedon is also sometimes wrong)

Please check

There also seem to be some other things in the generated pdf that could be fixed, such as double (())s around some citations, missing spaces before some citations, and some extra "s in one reference

After you make changes, enter a new comment here with @whedon generate pdf to check the result

馃憢 @will-rowe - would you be willing to edit this submission?

This looks cool - happy to.

@whedon assign @will-rowe as editor

OK, the editor is @will-rowe

Hi @vchuravy and @ahwillia - would you both be willing to review this submission?

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

Hi @ChrisRackauckas and @leios - would you please be able to review this submission for us?

Hey @will-rowe I can do it next week, if that works for everyone

Perfect - thanks a lot @leios. Next week is great. Once we've got a second reviewer, I can move this submission into review.

Hi, I will not be able to.

No worries @ChrisRackauckas - thanks for letting me know quickly

Hi @ninjin - would you please be able to review this submission for us?

Hi @ionlights - would you please be able to review this submission?

@ninjin would be an awesome reviewer (being a NLP researcher and a Julia dev).
But I know is incredibly busy right now.

I can do it, as long as I get two weeks to do so. That way I can clear the pre-Christmas hell first.

That's perfect - thanks @ninjin.

We're ready to move this over to review then. As it's Christmas etc., there's no rush on the reviews until the New Year as I know we're all busy this time of year.

@whedon assign @leios as reviewer

OK, the reviewer is @leios

@whedon add @ninjin as reviewer

OK, @ninjin is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1956. Feel free to close this issue now!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings