Submitting author: @fonsocarre (Alfonso del Carre)
Repository: https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/sharpy
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @labarba
Reviewers: @petebachant, @rafmudaf
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @fonsocarre. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@fonsocarre if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
Hi @labarba, could you take this submission on? Looks to be right up your alley!
@whedon assign @labarba as editor
OK, the editor is @labarba
๐ @mtezzele โ I see that you have published three papers with JOSS. Good job!
And you also already reviewed one paper. Thank you ๐
Could you contribute one more review for us? The submission is:
SHARPy: A dynamic aeroelastic simulation toolbox for very flexible aircraft and wind turbines
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/sharpy
๐ @petebachant โ Do you think you could contribute a review for JOSS on this submission? You haven't reviewed for us before, but I think you will like it. The whole process is done in the open, on a GitHub issue. Have a look at our Reviewer Guide.
The submission is:
_SHARPy: A dynamic aeroelastic simulation toolbox for very flexible aircraft and wind turbines_
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/sharpy
@labarba I believe I did review something for you folks at one point--maybe in a different journal but similar process. Anyway, I'm up for reviewing this!
@labarba @petebachant thank you! Iโm looking forward to receiving your feedback. Let me know if there is anything I can do to make this as easy as possible for everyone.
@ngoiz @ArturoMS13 @rafapalacios For you to keep an eye on this.
@whedon assign @petebachant as reviewer
OK, the reviewer is @petebachant
Thank you, Pete!
Stay tuned, everybody, until we assign a second reviewer
Dear @labarba, sorry but next weeks are not a good period for me, I have to decline this one. I'm really sorry, the package seems very cool. I hope to give you a hand in the future.
๐ @rafmudaf โ I found that you are a contributor of OpenFAST at NREL. Would you be interested in contributing a review for The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are done in the open, in a GitHub repo, and they focus on the quality of software for research uses. Have a look at our Reviewer Guide.
The submission I'm hoping you'd like to review is:
_SHARPy: A dynamic aeroelastic simulation toolbox for very flexible aircraft and wind turbines_
https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/sharpy
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1878
Hello @labarba - I'm happy to provide a review! The next few days are pretty packed, but I should be able to get started soon. Whats your time frame for me to complete it?
Terrific, @rafmudaf, thank you! We generally request reviewers to plan for a two-week (ideal) turn-around, but it's of course a soft deadline, and we appreciate that our volunteers have busy lives and do their best.
I'm going to assign you know and start the review (which will open a new GitHub issue).
@whedon add @rafmudaf as reviewer
OK, @rafmudaf is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1885. Feel free to close this issue now!
Most helpful comment
@whedon assign @labarba as editor