Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Capytaine: a Python-based linear potential flow solver

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mancellin (Matthieu Ancellin)
Repository: https://github.com/mancellin/capytaine
Version: v1.0
Editor: @leouieda
Reviewers: @mikaem, @harpolea

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mancellin. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mancellin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[arfon]

:wave: @leouieda - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[leouieda]

@arfon I'd be happy to :+1:

[arfon]

@whedon assign @leouieda as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @leouieda

[leouieda]

@whedon check references

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[leouieda]

:wave: Hi @mancellin I made a few editorial suggestions for the JOSS paper (mancellin/capytaine#6) and will start looking for reviewers now. Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions for reviewers.

[leouieda]

:wave: @harpolea @mikaem would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

[mikaem]

Hi. Looks interesting, I can do it.

[harpolea]

Sure, I'd be happy to review it

[leouieda]

@whedon assign @mikaem as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @mikaem

[leouieda]

@whedon add @harpolea as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @harpolea is now a reviewer

[leouieda]

@mikaem @harpolea thank you for agreeing to review :tada: :1st_place_medal:

[leouieda]

@whedon check references

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[leouieda]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[leouieda]

@mancellin please add these missing DOIs to your BibTex:

• https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77924
• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.007

[mancellin]

Done.

[whedon]

```Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

• 10.5802/smai-jcm.36 is OK
• 10.1115/OMAE2018-77924 is OK
• 10.1504/IJCSE.2009.029165 is OK
• 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
• 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
• 10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.007 is OK

MISSING DOIs

• None

INVALID DOIs

• None
  ```

[whedon]

```Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

• 10.5802/smai-jcm.36 is OK
• 10.1115/OMAE2018-77924 is OK
• 10.1504/IJCSE.2009.029165 is OK
• 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
• 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
• 10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.007 is OK

MISSING DOIs

• None

INVALID DOIs

• None
  ```

[leouieda]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1341. Feel free to close this issue now!

[leouieda]

@mikaem @harpolea Thank you for agreeing to review. Please head over to #1341 for the review. Feel free to ping me (@leouieda) in the review issue or elsewhere if you need any help or have questions.