Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: scikit-posthocs: Pairwise multiple comparison tests in Python

[whedon]

Submitting author: @maximtrp (Maksim Terpilowski)
Repository: https://github.com/maximtrp/scikit-posthocs
Version: 0.4.0
Editor: @katyhuff
Reviewers: mnarayan, @djmitche

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @maximtrp. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@maximtrp if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[maximtrp]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[maximtrp]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

:wave: @katyhuff - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[danielskatz]

👋 @katyhuff - ping...

[katyhuff]

I'm afraid I'm not able to contribute until January 1.

[danielskatz]

@katyhuff - that's fine - I'll go ahead and assign this to you, and assume that you'll start it in the new year.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @katyhuff as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @katyhuff

[katyhuff]

Hi @maximtrp thanks for this submission. I'm sorry for the delay. I'm back in action now. Now, @maximtrp , let's ping a few fitting reviewers, with computational statistics and python expertise. We can start the review once two or three of them accept the request to review.

---

Dear potential reviewers (@djmitche @kellieotto @mnarayan @acolum ),

Based on your expertise in computational statistics and python, I would like to ask if you can help us out with a submission to JOSS (The Journal of Open Source Software), where I’m an editor.

Title: Scikit-posthocs
Summary: scikit-posthocs provides statistical post-hoc tests for pairwise multiple comparisons and outliers detection algorithms. https://scikit-posthocs.readthedocs.io/
Topic: Computational Statistics, automated comparison plotting, scikit ecosystem, etc.
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.01120/joss.01120/10.21105.joss.01120.pdf
Submitting author: @maximtrp, (Maksim Terpilowski)
Repository: https://github.com/maximtrp/scikit-posthocs
Version: v0.4.0

@djmitche : Dustin, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?
@kellieotto : Kellie, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?
@mnarayan : Manjari, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?
@acolum : Alyssa, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?

Your prompt response is appreciated. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html for more information about reviewer criteria and the process if it is new to you.

[maximtrp]

Thank you, @katyhuff. Please correct the username of submitting author (it should be @maximtrp, not @maxheld83).

[katyhuff]

Sorry -- Tab completion error! Fixed.

[mnarayan]

I am happy to review this.

[katyhuff]

@whedon assign mnarayan as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is mnarayan

[djmitche]

I can review too.

[katyhuff]

@whedon add @djmitche as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @djmitche is now a reviewer

[katyhuff]

Ok - that should be enough reviewers for this paper. @kellieotto @acolum , you're off the hook!

[katyhuff]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1169. Feel free to close this issue now!

[katyhuff]

Thanks so much for volunteering to review @djmitche and @mnarayan ! Let's go over to #1169 for the review.