Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: ssdtools: An R package to fit Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs)

Created on 1 Nov 2018  路  18Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @joethorley (Joseph Thorley)
Repository: https://github.com/bcgov/ssdtools
Version: v0.0.3
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @ibarraespinosa, @nanhung

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @joethorley. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@joethorley if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
R TeX pre-review

Most helpful comment

@ibarraespinosa, @nanhung, @joethorley - please head over to #1082 for the main review thread.

All 18 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

potential reviewers are @nanhung and @ibarraespinosa

Looks great! I can review this paper.

Hi, thanks for suggesting me. Interesting work. If your paper passes to the review stage, I would review it.

@whedon commands

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

馃毀 馃毀 馃毀 Experimental Whedon features 馃毀 馃毀 馃毀

# Compile the paper from a custom git branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

@whedon assign @arfon as editor

OK, the editor is @arfon

@ibarraespinosa @nanhung - many thanks for agreeing to review this submission! I'll go ahead now and set you up as reviewers and start the review process.

@whedon add @ibarraespinosa as reviewer

OK, @ibarraespinosa is now a reviewer

@whedon add @nanhung as reviewer

OK, @nanhung is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1082. Feel free to close this issue now!

@ibarraespinosa, @nanhung, @joethorley - please head over to #1082 for the main review thread.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings