Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Pingouin: statistics in Python

Created on 6 Oct 2018  路  23Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @raphaelvallat (Raphael Vallat)
Repository: https://github.com/raphaelvallat/pingouin
Version: v0.1.10
Editor: @cMadan
Reviewers: @snastase

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @raphaelvallat. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@raphaelvallat if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
Jupyter Notebook Python TeX pre-review

Most helpful comment

@cMadan I should be able to help out. A bit overloaded right now, but should be able to get to it soon (< 1 week).

All 23 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon assign @cMadan as editor

OK, the editor is @cMadan

Hi @raphaelvallat! I'm happy to be editor for this submission. It looks like your submission is generally in order, though you can remove the Citations to entries in paper.bib should be in rMarkdown format. from the paper.

Do you have any suggestions for reviewers for this submission?

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon list reviewers

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

Hi @cMadan! Thank you for accepting to be the editor!

I just re-generated the PDF without the "Citation" part. I think that these reviewers would be a great fit:

  • snastase
  • nhejazi
  • kellieotto

Hi @cMadan!
Just released version 0.1.10 of Pingouin, is it possible to update the review to this version?
Thank you - Raphael

@raphaelvallat, that's not a problem. I've updated the version number in the initial comment.

@snastase @nhejazi @kellieotto, would you be available and interested to review this submission? Thanks for considering!

@cMadan I should be able to help out. A bit overloaded right now, but should be able to get to it soon (< 1 week).

@snastase, great, thank you! I will wait to see if anyone else is interested in also reviewing, and will start the review process early next week.

I'm in the thick of another review right now. I will pass on this one.

I'm also quite busy with reviews at the present. Happy to provide a review at a later date if necessary.

@kellieotto, no problem, thank you for considering!

@nhejazi, sounds good. I'll go ahead and start the review, but feel free to take a look at the submission if you have time. (Or, I may ask again if it looks like an additional perspective seems necessary.)

@whedon add @snastase as reviewer

OK, @snastase is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1026. Feel free to close this issue now!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings