Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: DataDepsGenerators.jl: making reusing data easy by automatically generating DataDeps.jl registration code

Created on 24 Aug 2018  路  28Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @oxinabox (Lyndon White)
Repository: https://github.com/oxinabox/DataDepsGenerators.jl/
Version: v0.4.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @ninjin

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @oxinabox. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@oxinabox if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
Julia TeX pre-review

Most helpful comment

Yes, I would be happy to review this.

All 28 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

PDF failed to compile for issue #914 with the following error:

/app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:in block in find': No such file or directory (Errno::ENOENT) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:incollect!'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:in find' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/lib/whedon/processor.rb:57:infind_paper_paths'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/bin/whedon:32:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:inrun'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:indispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/bin/whedon:99:in from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in

'

@whedon commands

What can't you find, robo-buddy?

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

馃毀 馃毀 馃毀 Experimental Whedon features 馃毀 馃毀 馃毀

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

@whedon generate pdf

Try again buddy

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

Potential Reviewers:

@noamross (Though this is not R, I know he's been involved in a similar project)

Basically any julia data science person from that list:

@vchuravy
@ahwillia
@ChrisRackauckas
@ninjin
@juliohm

I'd be happy to review @oxinabox after my PhD defense tomorrow :)

Thanks for pinging.

Cheers,

Good luck

@oxinabox I passed my defense! o/ Everything is super busy around here though as I am relocating, moving out from California, and submitting the final draft of the dissertation to the university. I thought I would have time to review your paper, but I am super busy wrapping up. Will join a vacation trip in the next weeks, which will literally put me offline for some time.

I appreciate if other Julians from your list of suggested reviewers can help: @vchuravy @ahwillia @ChrisRackauckas @ninjin

Yes, I would be happy to review this.

Thanks @ninjin , I think this needs to wait for an editor, and maybe a second reviewer, to proceed to the next stage?

@juliohm enjoy your break :-D.

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon assign @arfon as editor

OK, the editor is @arfon

@whedon assign @ninjin as reviewer

OK, the reviewer is @ninjin

Thanks for agreeing to review this submission @ninjin. I'll go ahead and set up the main review issue now...

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/921. Feel free to close this issue now!

@oxinabox @ninjin - please head over to #921 where the actual review will take place.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings