Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: KLRfome - Kernel Logistic Regression on Focal Mean Embeddings

Created on 16 Apr 2018  路  23Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @mrecos (Matthew Harris)
Repository: https://github.com/mrecos/klrfome
Version: v2.1.0
Editor: @leeper
Reviewers: @benmarwick

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mrecos. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@mrecos if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
HTML R TeX pre-review

All 23 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

PDF failed to compile for issue #677 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

Hello. Thanks for the Pre-review! From the reviewer list I would suggest: @benmarwick , @jsta , and @nuest or others with experience in archaeology, machine learning, or R and spatial analysis.
PS - I can certainly add more details to the paper.md if desired.
Thank you all for your efforts.

PS - I can certainly add more details to the paper.md if desired.

Thanks @mrecos - yes, please try and flesh the paper out in a little more detail following the guidelines from the main JOSS site:

  • A summary describing the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience
  • A clear statement of need that illustrates the purpose of the software
  • A list of key references including a link to the software archive
  • Mentions (if applicable) of any ongoing research projects using the software or recent scholarly publications enabled by it

@benmarwick - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

Thank you @arfon. I added a bit more detail to the paper. Please let me know if you have other suggested edits prior to review.

Yes, no worries, happy to review.

@arfon would you like me to handle as editor?

@arfon would you like me to handle as editor?

Thanks @leeper - that would be great!

@whedon commands

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer

# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

馃毀 馃毀 馃毀 Experimental Whedon features 馃毀 馃毀 馃毀

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

@whdon assign @leeper as editor

@whedon assign @leeper as editor

OK, the editor is @leeper

@whedon assign @benmarwick as reviewer

OK, the reviewer is @benmarwick

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/722. Feel free to close this issue now!

@benmarwick Thanks for agreeing to review!! The review issue is now open at #722.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings