Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Histogram-weighted Networks for Feature Extraction, Connectivity and Advanced Analysis in Neuroscience

[whedon]

Submitting author: @raamana (Pradeep Reddy Raamana)
Repository: https://github.com/raamana/hiwenet
Version: 0.2.2
Editor: @cMadan
Reviewer: @oesteban

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @raamana. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@raamana if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @cMadan it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

👋 @cMadan - the submitting author suggested you as a potential editor.

[raamana]

Thanks Afron and Chris for editing the submission.

I suggest some of the following as reviewers: @KirstieJane, @oesteban, @JohnGriffiths, or anyone else interested.

[cMadan]

@raamana, @arfon - I'd be happy to serve as editor for this submission

@KirstieJane, @oesteban, @JohnGriffiths - Are any of you interested/available to be a reviewer for this submission? For an overview of the review process, please see the reviewer guidelines (http://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines)

[oesteban]

@cMadan @raamana I'd very much like to review this submission :)

[raamana]

Great, thanks Oscar. Chris, perhaps we can get the review started with Oscar, while we get other reviewers join in?

[cMadan]

That sounds good to me. I'll start the review process and we'll take it from there :).

[cMadan]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[cMadan]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[JohnGriffiths]

I'm happy to review this

On 24 August 2017 at 16:06, Christopher Madan [e-mail]
wrote:

@raamana https://github.com/raamana - I'd be happy to serve as editor
for this submission

@KirstieJane https://github.com/kirstiejane, @oesteban
https://github.com/oesteban, @JohnGriffiths
https://github.com/johngriffiths - Are any of you interested/available
to be a reviewer for this submission? For an overview of the review
process, please see the reviewer guidelines (http://joss.theoj.org/about#
reviewer_guidelines)

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/376#issuecomment-324742573,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYSAg_GWnWcOqig4umAKMF2DfEeFH2vks5sbdfMgaJpZM4PB2t9
.

--

Dr. John Griffiths

Post-Doctoral Research Fellow

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest

Toronto, Canada

and

Honorary Associate

School of Physics

University of Sydney

[cMadan]

@arfon, I think I annoyed @whedon... The deleted comment was me trying to start the review and @whedon again asking for the magic-word. :/

@oesteban, @JohnGriffiths - I think it would be great to have both of you as reviewers, though the current JOSS system only allows one person to be 'officially' listed as the reviewer. Regardless, once I get the review started, please both review the submission and make comments accordingly.

[raamana]

If only one reviewer is needed, perhaps we could use @johngriffiths time to review #379? Thanks.

[danielskatz]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[danielskatz]

@cMadan - it's not just you :)

[JohnGriffiths]

Ok I can do that.

On 25 August 2017 at 19:58, Pradeep Reddy Raamana [e-mail]
wrote:

If only one reviewer is needed, perhaps we could use @JohnGriffiths
https://github.com/johngriffiths time to review #379
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/379? Thanks.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/376#issuecomment-325059825,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYSAnAYW1KX4OGRayw1MROy4jHxoiaHks5sb1-YgaJpZM4PB2t9
.

--

Dr. John Griffiths

Post-Doctoral Research Fellow

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest

Toronto, Canada

and

Honorary Associate

School of Physics

University of Sydney

[raamana]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

I'm sorry @raamana, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only JOSS editors are allowed to do.

[raamana]

LOL, atleast some parts of it are working :)

[cMadan]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[cMadan]

@whedon assign @oesteban as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @oesteban

[cMadan]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/380. Feel free to close this issue now!

[cMadan]

...I guess that's why the review didn't start, I forgot to assign a reviewer first :/

[KirstieJane]

Hey @cMadan & @raamana - I think you don't need me anymore, which is great because I'm pretty slammed with other reviews at the moment. Definitely happy to be included in the future 😄

[raamana]

No problem, Kirstie. I was interested in your comments as you are among my target audience :), and wanted to use your comments to improve this package.