Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Grafoscopio: A moldable tool for literate computing and reproducible research

[whedon]

Submitting author: @offray (Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas)
Repository: http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/
Version: 1.3.8
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @SergeStinckwich

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @offray. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@offray if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

👋 @offray - I'm looking for a potential reviewer for this submission. Could you point me to the source code for the package? Also, what programming language is this written in?

[offray]

Hi Arfon,

Thanks for your work with this.

The package is written in Pharo Smalltalk. We have two source
repositories for it, on for code at [1] and other for documentation and
issues at [2]

[1] smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Offray/Grafoscopio
[2] http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/grafoscopio/

Let me know anything else I can help with.

Cheers,

Offray

On 16/04/17 19:26, Arfon Smith wrote:
>

👋 @offray https://github.com/offray - I'm looking for a potential
reviewer for this submission. Could you point me to the source code
for the package? Also, what programming language is this written in?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/237#issuecomment-294383018,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFe1yv9Jf5VJK39fUq4UuNpnxODIjo7Aks5rwrHIgaJpZM4M-n-4.

[arfon]

OK thanks @offray. Based on our pool of existing reviewers (https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/docs/reviewers.csv) I think I'm going to struggle to find someone who is able to review this submission.

Do you have any suggestions for possible reviewers?

[offray]

Hi Arfon,

I suggested two reviewers in the submission process @acabunoc and
@jakevdp, but I could find some reviewers in the Pharo community, if
that's fine. Let me know and I will send the request ASAP.

Cheers,

Offray

On 19/04/17 04:32, Arfon Smith wrote:
>

OK thanks @offray https://github.com/offray. Based on our pool of
existing reviewers
(https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/docs/reviewers.csv)
I think I'm going to struggle to find someone who is able to review
this submission.

Do you have any suggestions for possible reviewers?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/237#issuecomment-295186931,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFe1ynSav_9RxAm6BcAcHvDkSsN4ARJCks5rxdSZgaJpZM4M-n-4.

[arfon]

Let me know and I will send the request ASAP.

@offray - yes, that would be great. I think a major challenge for reviewers is going to be verifying the functionality of the software as most people don't know Smalltalk.

[jakevdp]

I wouldn't even know where to begin to be honest :smile:

[offray]

OK. I will ask some help from the Pharo community here.

Cheers,

Offray

On 20/04/17 11:58, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
>

I wouldn't even know where to begin to be honest 😄

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/237#issuecomment-295813590,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFe1yng4Zor5toyUP39EzayVWTY9Lejzks5rx46YgaJpZM4M-n-4.

[SergeStinckwich]

I can help if needed but as I know Offray there might be a conflict of interest.

[offray]

Hi all,

Thanks @SergeStinckwich for your offering and for the proper disclaimer. Pharo, having a small community will have less degrees of separation. Despite of that, I think that in an open journal like JOSS, the "blindness" of peer review is not the main property, but its transparency.

@arfon and others are you fine with Serge offering? Stephan Ducasse has also offered as a reviewer.

Cheers,

[arfon]

@arfon and others are you fine with Serge offering? Stephan Ducasse has also offered as a reviewer.

:+1: I'm happy for @SergeStinckwich to handle this.

[arfon]

@whedon assign @arfon as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @arfon

[arfon]

@whedon assign @SergeStinckwich as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @SergeStinckwich

[arfon]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/251. Feel free to close this issue now!

[arfon]

@SergeStinckwich please head over to #251 for the actual review thread.