Jaeger: Proposal: rename jaeger-standalone to jaeger-all-in-one
The docker image is labeled all-in-one but we call the executable jaeger-standalone and that's how it is included in the binary distributions. I propose we change the executable to be called all-in-one as well.
We can probably even rename the source directory to cmd/all-in-one, since the package name there is main anyway.
yurishkuro
All 7 comments
let's keep releasing jaeger-standalone until we release 2.0? I'm pretty sure there are people who are directly using all-in-one.
black-adder
on 12 Jul 2018
everyone should be using versioned releases, so if we rename it in 1.7 it's not going to break anyone unless people explicitly upgrade.
yurishkuro
on 12 Jul 2018
everyone should be using versioned releases
Specifically, we're talking about renaming the binary, which you can ONLY download from a concrete version (unlike Docker images where we, mistakenly, published tag "1")
yurishkuro
on 12 Jul 2018
Funny, I thought about opening an issue some time ago about this, but in the other direction: instead of "all-in-one", standardizing on "standalone".
jpkrohling
on 12 Jul 2018
I think picking one name is more important than which name, but I think all-in-one is a bit more accurate and, more importantly, backwards compatible - there are many blog posts that refer to it already.
yurishkuro
on 12 Jul 2018
For the record, I have nothing against all-in-one. I just find it easier to type "standalone" instead :-)
jpkrohling
on 13 Jul 2018
:thumbsup:
Dieterbe
on 9 Aug 2018
Related issues
black-adder
路
4Comments
pawarvijay
路
3Comments
rur0
路
4Comments
saulshanabrook
路
4Comments
trondhindenes
路
4Comments
Most helpful comment
I think picking one name is more important than which name, but I think all-in-one is a bit more accurate and, more importantly, backwards compatible - there are many blog posts that refer to it already.