Itk: Support itk.Image use in Dask Array `map_blocks`

Created on 14 Jul 2019  ยท  5Comments  ยท  Source: InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK

To avoid explicit type coersion in Dask Array map_blocks, consider adding

  • [x] dtype
  • [x] shape
  • [x] ndim
  • [ ] __array_function__

to itk.Image.

@jakirkham @mrocklin

Python wrapping Enhancement

Most helpful comment

Woot. Have we tried this out in a workflow yet? If not, it might be fun
to try something and throw it into a "Better ITK and Dask Integration"
blogpost.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:40 PM jakirkham notifications@github.com wrote:

Nice! Thanks for the update Matt ๐Ÿ˜„

โ€”
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/issues/1091#issuecomment-618158352,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACKZTGLLS3TBULKKDHCHJ3RN62CXANCNFSM4IDR56VQ
.

All 5 comments

ndim, dtype, shape added in #1780

Nice! Thanks for the update Matt ๐Ÿ˜„

Woot. Have we tried this out in a workflow yet? If not, it might be fun
to try something and throw it into a "Better ITK and Dask Integration"
blogpost.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:40 PM jakirkham notifications@github.com wrote:

Nice! Thanks for the update Matt ๐Ÿ˜„

โ€”
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/issues/1091#issuecomment-618158352,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACKZTGLLS3TBULKKDHCHJ3RN62CXANCNFSM4IDR56VQ
.

@mrocklin great idea -- I'll see about following up on our initial post with some denoising...

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings