ITK 5.0_rc1 fails to build with `multilib-strict check failed`

[TheChymera]

This is a follow-up on my effort to version bump the available ITK version for Gentoo Linux, of which the first issue was successfully solved by updating hdf5.

Description

ITK fails to build

Steps to Reproduce

cmake --no-warn-unused-cli -C /var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/itk-5.0_rc1/work/itk-5.0_rc1_build/gentoo_common_config.cmake -G Unix Makefiles -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_DCMTK=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_DOUBLECONVERSION=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_GCCXML=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_HDF5=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_JPEG=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_PNG=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_SWIG=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_TIFF=ON -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_ZLIB=ON -DITK_BUILD_DEFAULT_MODULES=ON -DITK_COMPUTER_MEMORY_SIZE=1 -DWRAP_ITK_JAVA=OFF -DWRAP_ITK_TCL=OFF -Ddouble-conversion_INCLUDE_DIRS=/usr/include/double-conversion -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF -DBUILD_EXAMPLES=OFF -DITK_USE_REVIEW=OFF -DITKV3_COMPATIBILITY=OFF -DITK_WRAP_PYTHON=OFF -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Gentoo -DCMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP=OFF -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/itk-5.0_rc1/work/itk-5.0_rc1_build/gentoo_toolchain.cmake /var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/itk-5.0_rc1/work/ITK-5.0rc01

Actual behavior

build.log

[thewtex]

@TheChymera thanks for the report.

[thewtex]

@TheChymera , if I interpret build.log correctly, if we change the installation from usr/lib/libITKSpatialObjects-5.0.so.1 to usr/lib64/libITKSpatialObjects-5.0.so.1, e.g., the test will pass.

Is there a Gentoo Docker image and set of commands I can use to reproduce your build locally?

Side note, with ITK 5, a few updates to the CMake build options can be made:

• -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_GCCXML=ON -> -DITK_USE_SYSTEM_CASTXML=ON and install CastXML.
• -DITKV3_COMPATIBILITY=OFF can be removed.
• -G Unix Makefiles -> "-GUnix Makefiles"
• -DITK_USE_REVIEW=OFF can be removed

[TheChymera]

If you can send me an ssh public key I can give you temporary access to one of our testing servers.

Are the itkv3 compatibility and review oprions fully disabled? i.e. will =ON also be meaningless?

[dzenanz]

ITKv3 compatibility is meaningless. Review module still exists, but most stuff has been taken out of it and put into other modules.

[thewtex]

@TheChymera here is my public key:

ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQCXBMhWVWJDdkhquiKQmdIUZGs03ypSIx0REHypXBcVjtDdaE5EuNEfWXCT3hx3VtZSYTmDNt5g5xIUGuwFIy5bkxQJ+A3Wn2i1IDKDY5HwqTV74mNQa7917VLofh1q/T49QpKyy5yfejkDkLH5eYjKaTF2eWPOsPBz4dDatQ3lGYU2kyaP9ubLFlFs2ltJRER+T3jH+JRjOMFW4Zg9IrDRhcN3EBkbjqLIRQZYuOck8q4vijvmJBsayF84HG3Zh8s1otTBiXauYocPHJRkXn28wYR44GQCfcgRQMHfZT0P+HAdSI16ODMh4wdleVMxaPhhEke9b6bcEDqeVtnOml0D matt@ethan

I can also be reached to follow-up at matt.[email protected]. Thanks!

[TheChymera]

@thewtex Hi, I set up the testing server for you but accidentally ended up fixing the issue while I was at it :D The solution was to set ITK_INSTALL_LIBRARY_DIR. Thank you all for your help.

There's still some other issues, but maybe best handled in a separate report.

[TheChymera]

if you would like to further help me with this, the next issue is here https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/issues/635