

It'd be much more readable if the generic parameters concrete types were just inlined into the signature itself, like C# editors do. I.e. the above signature should look like this:

Or maybe something like Flow<'t: int, 'u: int, 'mat: obj> would be even better.
I would imagine that we would keep the argument names though (in your sample screenshot they appear to have been removed)?
We can do this.
@isaacabraham yes, the latter screenshot is real :)
I do think that Flow<'t: int, 'u: int, 'mat: obj> is the best approach.
@Krzysztof-Cieslak how are you gonna do this (don't tell me by text replace :)?
By text replace
:)
@vasily-kirichenko What I meant was, I'd like to keep the argument names rather than just the types. But yes, showing concrete types is nice.
i 馃憥 this. a lot.
while is nice in c#, in f# ihmo is bad
't and 't: int belowThis is probably an artifact of inference anyway, the flow function, if polymorphic, accepts arbitrary types, its probably clearer is they are not made rigid in the function definition.
I think I like current state of the tooltips, and this would have some disadvantages as mentioned by @enricosada
Most helpful comment
By text replace